{chem}[intel/2023a] NWChem v7.2.2

[smoors]

(created using eb --new-pr)

depends on

• make various fixes and enhancements to NWChem easyblock easybuild-easyblocks#3049

[smoors]

@boegelbot: please test @ generoso
EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr=3049"

[boegelbot]

@smoors: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=19385 EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr=3049" EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_19385 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 12361

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1847927498 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[smoors]

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen2
EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr=3049"

[boegelbot]

@smoors: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster

PR test command 'EB_PR=19385 EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr=3049" EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --mem-per-cpu=4000M --job-name test_PR_19385 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen2.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 3870

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1848327256 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[branfosj]

Test report by @branfosj
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3049
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (1 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0105u03a - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8360Y CPU @ 2.40GHz (icelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/branfosj/085c8ca8d3b890d783f5a16061897596 for a full test report.

[smoors]

Test report by @smoors
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3049
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
node300.hydra.os - Linux Rocky Linux 8.8, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6148 CPU @ 2.40GHz (skylake_avx512), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/smoors/562d885544faa76df71940ef80c2682e for a full test report.

[smoors]

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen2
EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr=3049"

[boegelbot]

@smoors: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster

PR test command 'EB_PR=19385 EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr=3049" EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --mem-per-cpu=4000M --job-name test_PR_19385 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen2.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 3878

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1850670083 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3049
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen2c1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/cc58a7712f42602028c0243dc55efbe4 for a full test report.

[smoors]

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen2
EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr=3049 --ignore-locks"

[boegelbot]

@smoors: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster

PR test command 'EB_PR=19385 EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr=3049 --ignore-locks" EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --mem-per-cpu=4000M --job-name test_PR_19385 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen2.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 3879

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1850677745 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3049
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen2c1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/c0f660b387c495af6489133562d57745 for a full test report.

[smoors]

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen2
EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr=3049"

[boegelbot]

@smoors: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster

PR test command 'EB_PR=19385 EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr=3049" EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --mem-per-cpu=4000M --job-name test_PR_19385 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen2.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 3888

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1852303843 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3049
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen2c1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/740f7189c74f369004ed962626fbc0cb for a full test report.

[branfosj]

Test report by @branfosj
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3049
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0105u03b - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8360Y CPU @ 2.40GHz (icelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/branfosj/979bd8f1c2abb9a9681548a181e85242 for a full test report.

[branfosj]

Going in, thanks @smoors!