Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{bio}[foss/2023a] OpenMM-Torch v20240816, OpenMMTools v0.23.1 #21251

Conversation

WilleBell
Copy link
Contributor

(created using eb --new-pr)

@WilleBell
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test report by @WilleBell
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
node614.hydra.os - Linux Rocky Linux 8.10, x86_64, AMD EPYC 9384X 32-Core Processor, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/WilleBell/04646aa1f5549c8a455feb72b93d4366 for a full test report.

@WilleBell
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test report by @WilleBell
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
node601.hydra.os - Linux Rocky Linux 8.10, x86_64, AMD EPYC 9384X 32-Core Processor, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/WilleBell/46ba90fcbe7c7a7644bd8d6419a0f404 for a full test report.

@lexming
Copy link
Contributor

lexming commented Sep 25, 2024

@boegelbot: please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@lexming: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=21251 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_21251 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 14340

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 2374229959 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/a041a49e843ba3bf76f5c6c1c2f58af3 for a full test report.

@lexming
Copy link
Contributor

lexming commented Sep 26, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@lexming: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=21251 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_21251 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 4945

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 2376636731 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.4, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.18
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/d01245fed49114426810d439a9d27f31 for a full test report.

Copy link
Contributor

@lexming lexming left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@lexming
Copy link
Contributor

lexming commented Sep 26, 2024

Merging, thanks @WilleBell !

@lexming lexming merged commit bb98871 into easybuilders:develop Sep 26, 2024
9 checks passed
@lexming lexming added the update label Sep 26, 2024
@lexming lexming added this to the release after 4.9.4 milestone Sep 26, 2024
@lexming lexming added the new label Sep 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants