Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[StepSecurity] Apply security best practices #259

Conversation

step-security-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

This pull request is created by StepSecurity at the request of @james-d-elliott. Please merge the Pull Request to incorporate the requested changes. Please tag @james-d-elliott on your message if you have any questions related to the PR.

Security Fixes

Least Privileged GitHub Actions Token Permissions

The GITHUB_TOKEN is an automatically generated secret to make authenticated calls to the GitHub API. GitHub recommends setting minimum token permissions for the GITHUB_TOKEN.

Pinned Dependencies

GitHub Action tags and Docker tags are mutable. This poses a security risk. GitHub's Security Hardening guide recommends pinning actions to full length commit.

Harden Runner

Harden-Runner is an open-source security agent for the GitHub-hosted runner to prevent software supply chain attacks. It prevents exfiltration of credentials, detects tampering of source code during build, and enables running jobs without sudo access.

Harden runner usage

You can find link to view insights and policy recommendation in the build log

Please refer to documentation to find more details.

Keeping your actions up to date with Dependabot

With Dependabot version updates, when Dependabot identifies an outdated dependency, it raises a pull request to update the manifest to the latest version of the dependency. This is recommended by GitHub as well as The Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF).

Detect Vulnerabilities with SAST Workflow

Static Code Analysis (also known as Source Code Analysis) is usually performed as part of a Code Review (also known as clear-box testing) and is carried out at the Implementation phase of a Security Development Lifecycle (SDL). Static Code Analysis commonly refers to the running of Static Code Analysis tools that attempt to highlight possible vulnerabilities within ‘static’ (non-running) source code by using techniques such as Taint Analysis and Data Flow Analysis.

Add Dependency Review Workflow

The Dependency Review Workflow enforces dependency reviews on your pull requests. The action scans for vulnerable versions of dependencies introduced by package version changes in pull requests, and warns you about the associated security vulnerabilities. This gives you better visibility of what's changing in a pull request, and helps prevent vulnerabilities being added to your repository.

Add OpenSSF Scorecard Workflow

OpenSSF Scorecard is an automated tool that assesses a number of important heuristics ("checks") associated with software security and assigns each check a score of 0-10. You can use these scores to understand specific areas to improve in order to strengthen the security posture of your project.

Scorecard workflow also allows maintainers to display a Scorecard badge on their repository to show off their hard work.

Maintain Code Quality with Pre-Commit

Pre-commit is a framework for managing and maintaining multi-language pre-commit hooks. Hooks can be any scripts, code, or binaries that run at any stage of the git workflow. Pre-commit hooks are useful for enforcing code quality, code formatting, and detecting security vulnerabilities.

Feedback

For bug reports, feature requests, and general feedback; please email [email protected]. To create such PRs, please visit https://app.stepsecurity.io/securerepo.

Signed-off-by: StepSecurity Bot [email protected]

@step-security-bot step-security-bot requested a review from a team as a code owner July 21, 2024 01:47
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 21, 2024

Walkthrough

This update enhances the project's automation and security by introducing several new GitHub Actions workflows for dependency management, code analysis, and security assessments, alongside updates to existing workflows. Additionally, a pre-commit configuration is implemented to improve code quality. These improvements aim to streamline development, enhance security practices, and ensure timely updates to dependencies, fostering a robust software development lifecycle.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/dependabot.yml New configuration for Dependabot to handle GitHub Actions and Go modules with daily update schedules.
.github/workflows/codeql.yml New workflow for CodeQL analysis on Go projects, triggered on pushes, pull requests, and weekly schedules.
.github/workflows/dependency-review.yml New workflow that scans dependencies for vulnerabilities on pull requests.
.github/workflows/go.yml Enhanced Go workflow with permissions, hardening steps, and updated action versions for improved security.
.github/workflows/scorecards.yml New workflow for supply-chain security assessments using OpenSSF Scorecard, triggered by specific events.
.pre-commit-config.yaml Added configuration for pre-commit hooks including gitleaks, golangci-lint, and formatting fixes.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Dev as Developer
    participant PR as Pull Request
    participant CI as CI/CD Pipeline
    participant BD as Dependabot
    participant CA as Code Analysis
    participant SR as Security Review

    Dev->>PR: Create or update PR
    PR->>CI: Trigger builds and tests
    CI->>BD: Check for dependency updates
    BD->>CI: Provide update suggestions
    CI->>CA: Run CodeQL analysis
    CA-->>CI: Code quality results
    CI->>SR: Conduct vulnerability scan
    SR-->>CI: Security assessment results
    CI-->>Dev: Feedback on PR
Loading

🐰 In a garden of code, where the rabbits play,
New workflows hop in to brighten the day.
With checks and balances, our code will be fit,
Dependencies managed, all bugs we'll outwit!
So let's celebrate changes, both big and small,
For a secure and clean codebase, we'll have a ball! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b5e375e and 84d347c.

Files selected for processing (6)
  • .github/dependabot.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/codeql.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/dependency-review.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/go.yml (2 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/scorecards.yml (1 hunks)
  • .pre-commit-config.yaml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .github/dependabot.yml
Additional comments not posted (13)
.pre-commit-config.yaml (1)

1-14: Pre-commit configuration looks good!

The configuration includes repositories for gitleaks, golangci-lint, and pre-commit-hooks, which are well-known tools for security and code quality. The versions are pinned, which is a best practice for security.

.github/workflows/dependency-review.yml (1)

1-27: Dependency review workflow looks good!

The workflow is well-structured and includes steps to harden the runner, check out the repository, and perform a dependency review. The versions of actions are pinned, which is a best practice for security.

.github/workflows/go.yml (3)

7-9: Permissions configuration looks good!

The permissions section grants read access to the contents, which is a good practice for limiting access.


21-25: Harden Runner step looks good!

The step uses the step-security/harden-runner action with an egress-policy set to audit, which enhances security by monitoring outbound network traffic.


27-31: Pinned versions for actions look good!

The versions for setup-go and checkout actions are pinned to specific commits, which is a best practice for security.

.github/workflows/codeql.yml (4)

1-12: LGTM!

The header comments provide clear guidance on the purpose and modification of the file. The workflow name is appropriately set to "CodeQL".


14-21: LGTM!

The triggers are appropriately set to ensure regular and event-driven CodeQL analysis.


23-25: LGTM!

The permissions are set to read contents and write security events, aligning with the principle of least privilege.


26-78: LGTM!

The analyze job is well-defined and includes necessary steps for CodeQL analysis. The use of pinned dependencies enhances security.

.github/workflows/scorecards.yml (4)

1-5: LGTM!

The header comments provide clear guidance on the use of third-party actions. The workflow name is appropriately set to "Scorecard supply-chain security".


6-16: LGTM!

The triggers are appropriately set to ensure regular and event-driven Scorecard analysis.


17-31: LGTM!

The permissions are set to read-only by default, with additional permissions granted as needed, aligning with the principle of least privilege.


20-76: LGTM!

The analysis job is well-defined and includes necessary steps for Scorecard analysis. The use of pinned dependencies enhances security.

@james-d-elliott james-d-elliott merged commit f5fa279 into go-webauthn:master Jul 21, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants