Procedures that extend and compose retryers should be named with a different pattern than procedures that merely construct retryers from non-retryer values. I'm thinking x-retryer for plain constructors and retryer-x for combinators. This means cycle-retryer has to change to retryer-cycle.
Procedures that extend and compose retryers should be named with a different pattern than procedures that merely construct retryers from non-retryer values. I'm thinking
x-retryerfor plain constructors andretryer-xfor combinators. This meanscycle-retryerhas to change toretryer-cycle.