-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 561
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
make health options configurable #1428
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
make health options configurable #1428
Conversation
Hi @nwsparks. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: nwsparks, seanzatzdev-amazon The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/lgtm |
/retest |
@nwsparks: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
the test failures seem unrelated to my changes, appears to have failed during test setup. can someone rerun this? |
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
/ok-to-test |
@@ -175,7 +179,7 @@ node: | |||
affinity: | |||
nodeAffinity: | |||
requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution: | |||
nodeSelectorTerms: | |||
serms: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
are these changes here necessary?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sorry about this. they seem to have come in when I pulled the latest changes to bring the PR up to date. I'll fix it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, you can leave another comment when it's updated to help us respond quickly
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should be corrected now, sorry for the trouble
Left a comment |
ec35bc1
to
892ee98
Compare
Is this a bug fix or adding new feature?
#1411
#336
What is this PR about? / Why do we need it?
makes health checks configurable for troubleshooting purposes/slow nodes
named the values this way to keep them consistent with the health port definition
What testing is done?
lint/template/kuebconform