Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adopt storage package in cloudprovider-azure #2312

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

MartinForReal
Copy link
Contributor

@MartinForReal MartinForReal commented Jan 2, 2025

What type of PR is this?

What this PR does / why we need it:
Adopt storage package in cloud provider
Bump k8s.io to 0.32.0
Add license files
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Requirements:

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

none

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jan 2, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 2, 2025
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 6, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 7, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: MartinForReal
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign andyzhangx for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@MartinForReal MartinForReal force-pushed the shafan/bump branch 3 times, most recently from 828db65 to eca56d5 Compare January 7, 2025 17:32
@MartinForReal MartinForReal marked this pull request as ready for review January 7, 2025 17:32
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 7, 2025
@MartinForReal MartinForReal force-pushed the shafan/bump branch 2 times, most recently from 8221069 to 2cc9659 Compare January 8, 2025 03:17
@MartinForReal MartinForReal changed the title bumpcloudprovider Adopt storage package in cloudprovider-azure Jan 8, 2025
@MartinForReal MartinForReal force-pushed the shafan/bump branch 3 times, most recently from 19a3761 to 9adf2f0 Compare January 8, 2025 04:54
@andyzhangx
Copy link
Member

/retest

1 similar comment
@MartinForReal
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@MartinForReal
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test pull-azurefile-csi-driver-sanity

@@ -47,7 +46,7 @@ type azureFileDataplaneClient struct {
*service.Client
}

func newAzureFileClient(accountName, accountKey, storageEndpointSuffix string, backoff *retry.Backoff) (azureFileClient, error) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

backoff is necessary here, otherwise you would get the

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

that's the reason why sanity test failed

@andyzhangx
Copy link
Member

GRPC error: rpc error: code = Internal desc = failed to create VHD disk: Put "https://f03856e3ec57145f69c28c1.core.windows.net/pvcd-8e06e85a-ed0c-48f4-88ac-6d02d5d11ade/pvcd-8e06e85a-ed0c-48f4-88ac-6d02d5d11ade.vhd": dial tcp: lookup f03856e3ec57145f69c28c1.core.windows.net on 168.63.129.16:53: no such host

I think you are missing file in https://f03856e3ec57145f69c28c1.core.windows.net, it should be https://f03856e3ec57145f69c28c1.file.core.windows.net

@MartinForReal MartinForReal force-pushed the shafan/bump branch 2 times, most recently from d8f4c97 to beacf71 Compare January 8, 2025 14:33
@MartinForReal
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test pull-azurefile-csi-driver-sanity

@MartinForReal MartinForReal force-pushed the shafan/bump branch 3 times, most recently from cca2ffc to 237c8fe Compare January 9, 2025 03:00
bump k8s.io to 0.32.0
add license files

Signed-off-by: MartinForReal <[email protected]>
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@MartinForReal: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-azurefile-csi-driver-sanity a295afe link true /test pull-azurefile-csi-driver-sanity
pull-azurefile-csi-driver-external-e2e-smb a295afe link true /test pull-azurefile-csi-driver-external-e2e-smb
pull-azurefile-csi-driver-external-e2e-nfs a295afe link true /test pull-azurefile-csi-driver-external-e2e-nfs
pull-azurefile-csi-driver-e2e-migration a295afe link true /test pull-azurefile-csi-driver-e2e-migration
pull-azurefile-csi-driver-e2e-capz a295afe link true /test pull-azurefile-csi-driver-e2e-capz
pull-azurefile-csi-driver-e2e-capz-windows-2022-hostprocess a295afe link true /test pull-azurefile-csi-driver-e2e-capz-windows-2022-hostprocess
pull-azurefile-csi-driver-e2e-migration-windows a295afe link true /test pull-azurefile-csi-driver-e2e-migration-windows
pull-azurefile-csi-driver-e2e-capz-windows-2019-hostprocess a295afe link true /test pull-azurefile-csi-driver-e2e-capz-windows-2019-hostprocess

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants