Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor validation logic around checking for multiple options #17187

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

justinsb
Copy link
Member

@justinsb justinsb commented Jan 8, 2025

We also have to move some of the EnvVar handling around to avoid a circular reference.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Jan 8, 2025
@justinsb justinsb changed the title Refactor validation logic around checking for multiple options WIP: Refactor validation logic around checking for multiple options Jan 8, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from hakman January 8, 2025 17:06
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from justinsb. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from olemarkus January 8, 2025 17:06
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/api size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. labels Jan 8, 2025
@justinsb
Copy link
Member Author

justinsb commented Jan 8, 2025

WIP because I want to validate that this detects that the json names aren't yet right in v1alpha3 (also I need to rebase for kindnet)

@justinsb justinsb force-pushed the wip_cleanup_options_checking branch from 6b8ec70 to 7df0636 Compare January 8, 2025 17:09
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 8, 2025
@justinsb justinsb force-pushed the wip_cleanup_options_checking branch from 7df0636 to 33a1c37 Compare January 8, 2025 18:16
We also have to move some of the EnvVar handling around to avoid a circular reference.
@justinsb justinsb force-pushed the wip_cleanup_options_checking branch from 33a1c37 to 5fa9690 Compare January 8, 2025 23:23
@justinsb
Copy link
Member Author

justinsb commented Jan 9, 2025

/retest

@justinsb justinsb changed the title WIP: Refactor validation logic around checking for multiple options Refactor validation logic around checking for multiple options Jan 9, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/api cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants