feat: rework auth flow - part 1

[chemelli74]

See #205 for reference

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Introduced a new method to easily retrieve default keys.
• Improvements
  • Standardized the naming of default keys for consistency and clarity.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@chemelli74 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 4 minutes and 38 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 85b5ac3 and dedd402.

Walkthrough

The DEFAULT_KEYS constant in the Cloud class was renamed from default_keys. A new method, get_default_keys, was introduced to return these keys. Consequently, the logic to add default keys within the get_keys method was removed, streamlining the process by delegating it to the new method.

Changes

File	Change Summary
midealocal/cloud.py	Renamed default_keys to DEFAULT_KEYS and added the get_default_keys method. Removed default key addition logic from get_keys method.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Cloud
    User->>Cloud: Call get_keys()
    Cloud-->>User: Respond with keys (excluding default keys)

    Note right of User: With New Changes

    User->>Cloud: Call get_keys()
    Cloud->>Cloud: Call get_default_keys()
    Cloud-->>User: Respond with keys (including default keys)

Loading

Poem

In the clouds where data flies,
Keys once hidden now arise,
DEFAULT_KEYS in a tidy way,
get_default_keys will save the day!
Simplified, streamlined, code refined,
A rabbit's joy in changes kind. 🐇✨

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b364248 and 85b5ac3.

Files selected for processing (1)

• midealocal/cloud.py (3 hunks)

Additional comments not posted (2)

midealocal/cloud.py (2)

73-75: Ensure consistency with naming conventions.

The constant DEFAULT_KEYS follows the naming convention for constants. The structure and values appear correct.

Tools

Gitleaks

75-75: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)

---

185-187: LGTM! Ensure proper usage of the new method.

The method get_default_keys correctly returns the DEFAULT_KEYS constant. Ensure that the method is used correctly in the codebase.

Verification successful

---

LGTM! Ensure proper usage of the new method.

The method get_default_keys correctly returns the DEFAULT_KEYS constant, and there is no direct usage of DEFAULT_KEYS elsewhere in the codebase. The encapsulation is properly maintained.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the `get_default_keys` method to ensure it is used correctly.

# Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Proper usage of the method.
rg --type python -A 5 $'get_default_keys'

Length of output: 71

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the `get_default_keys` method to ensure it is used correctly.

# Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Proper usage of the method.
rg --type py -A 5 $'get_default_keys'

Length of output: 403

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the `DEFAULT_KEYS` constant to ensure it is not being used directly and the `get_default_keys` method is utilized correctly.

# Test: Search for the `DEFAULT_KEYS` usage. Expect: Proper usage of the constant through the method.
rg --type py $'DEFAULT_KEYS'

Length of output: 112

[codecov-commenter]

⚠️ Please install the to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 32.82%. Comparing base (b364248) to head (dedd402).

Files	Patch %	Lines
midealocal/cli.py	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #219      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   32.83%   32.82%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          80       80              
  Lines        6981     6985       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits         2292     2293       +1     
- Misses       4689     4692       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[rokam]

LGTM