Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement Project Doctype Custom Fields in Phamos App #90

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

realespee
Copy link
Contributor

@realespee realespee commented Jan 13, 2025

Gitlab Work Item: https://git.phamos.eu/phamos/phamos/-/work_items/113

Implementation

  • Recreated Doctypes that Project Doctype Depends on i.e Project Phase, Project Phases, Project Stakeholder
  • Imported all the Custom Fields of Project Doctype; They are in 3 Tabs --> Details, ERPNext Standard, Stakeholder
  • Refactored the Project Customization to fit arrangement similar to that on Prod
  • Changed the Numbering of Phase Sections Initiating, Planning, Executing and Closing from 1,2,3,5 -> 1,2,3,4

Screenshots for local development environment

project_dev_local erpnext_standard_tab_dev_local stakeholder_dev_local

Compare with the below shots from the Production Environment

proddetails_tab erpnext_standard_production projprod_stakeholder

@roquegv
Copy link
Contributor

roquegv commented Jan 13, 2025

@realespee
I don't get what you mean by "Changed the Numbering of Phase Sections Initiating, Planning, Executing and Closing from 1,2,3,5 -> 1,2,3,4" and I don't see any image for this point. Cloud you please elaborate a bit more on this?

@realespee
Copy link
Contributor Author

realespee commented Jan 14, 2025

@realespee I don't get what you mean by "Changed the Numbering of Phase Sections Initiating, Planning, Executing and Closing from 1,2,3,5 -> 1,2,3,4" and I don't see any image for this point. Cloud you please elaborate a bit more on this?

@roquegv check the shots below for reference

LOCAL DEV ENVIRONMENT
pr_numbering

PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENT SHOT
pr_numbering_prod

@realespee
Copy link
Contributor Author

@roquegv I also added one more commit adding a Department field on the Implementation doctype form.
Gitlab Work Item : https://git.phamos.eu/phamos/phamos/-/work_items/114

The rationale is to ensure that each Implementation belongs to a particular department. See below screenshot

department_field_on_implementation

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants