Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adapt Nova usage of commitment to the generic trait #63

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 30, 2024

Conversation

arnaucube
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@arnaucube arnaucube added the Nova label Jan 26, 2024
@arnaucube arnaucube requested review from han0110 and CPerezz January 26, 2024 09:24
@arnaucube arnaucube force-pushed the feature/nova-generic-commitment branch from 9118cb3 to 57180c0 Compare January 26, 2024 09:33
Copy link
Collaborator

@han0110 han0110 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Just a tiny question.

src/folding/nova/decider.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@arnaucube arnaucube force-pushed the feature/nova-generic-commitment branch from 57180c0 to 9590ad3 Compare January 29, 2024 06:05
Copy link
Member

@CPerezz CPerezz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

Just as a note for the future, after having the end-to-end test working. We need to work hard on simplifying the trait bounds on this crate.

@@ -1 +1 @@
1.73.0
1.75.0
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do we need this bump?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was keeping with the latest release, but if it makes sense to stick to a specific one I'm also happy.

Comment on lines +229 to +231
CP1: CommitmentProver<C1>,
// enforce that the CP2 is Pedersen commitment, since we're at Ethereum's EVM decider
CP2: CommitmentProver<C2, Params = PedersenParams<C2>>,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good for now. But we need to find a way to simplify trait bounds here.

@arnaucube arnaucube added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 30, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit f85a056 Jan 30, 2024
3 checks passed
@arnaucube arnaucube deleted the feature/nova-generic-commitment branch February 14, 2024 21:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants