Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(target_chains/ton): add ton js sdk #2044

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 16, 2024
Merged

feat(target_chains/ton): add ton js sdk #2044

merged 5 commits into from
Oct 16, 2024

Conversation

cctdaniel
Copy link
Contributor

@cctdaniel cctdaniel commented Oct 15, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 15, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
api-reference ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 16, 2024 7:33am
staking ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 16, 2024 7:33am
1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
proposals ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Oct 16, 2024 7:33am

target_chains/ton/sdk/js/README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
target_chains/ton/sdk/js/package.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

isn't this now the same as the wrapper 🤔 i think we should only keep one instance and reuse it everywhere

@cctdaniel cctdaniel merged commit 5ad83ce into ton-deploy Oct 16, 2024
6 checks passed
@cctdaniel cctdaniel deleted the ton-sdk branch October 16, 2024 07:37
cctdaniel added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2024
* init

* update deploy script

* precommit

* remove temp

* refactor test wrappers

* feat(target_chains/ton): add ton js sdk (#2044)

* init ton js sdk

* fix docs

* fix

* address comments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants