Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

QuTiPv5 Paper Notebook: Floquet formalism and speed comparison #114

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Langhaarzombie
Copy link
Contributor

@Langhaarzombie Langhaarzombie commented Nov 21, 2024

Adds the floquet examples from the paper with speed comparison to sesolve.

In the paper, there is one extra plot that compares computation time scaling i.r.t. the dimensionality to the Ising chain. This plot is currently not reproduced as it would take a long time to compute. Instead, the example includes the computation for one specific dimension of the Ising chain.

TODO:

  • Tests
  • Content check once license is figured out
  • Include references and format like this

- added driven single qubit simulation with sesolve and floquet
- added driven ising chain for specific dimension N
- added authors
- added about and test section
- corrected kernelspec
Copy link
Member

@nwlambert nwlambert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great. We can tag Marc Gali as a co-author, he provided this floquet performance analysis.

Langhaarzombie and others added 3 commits December 2, 2024 14:51
- fixed many typos
- insttructions resemble the paper less now
Copy link
Member

@pmenczel pmenczel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good from my side (however, let's wait with merging)

@Langhaarzombie Langhaarzombie marked this pull request as ready for review December 2, 2024 07:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants