Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

polish openai RAG #135

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

polish openai RAG #135

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

rajadilipkolli
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@rajadilipkolli rajadilipkolli self-assigned this Jan 2, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 2, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces changes to the testing configuration and request handling in a Spring AI-based RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) application. The modifications involve refactoring the test setup by introducing a new ContainersConfig class to manage PostgreSQL container configuration, removing previous test-related configurations, and updating the request factory initialization in the ResponseHeadersModification class. These changes streamline the testing approach and enhance the request handling mechanism.

Changes

File Change Summary
rag/.../ResponseHeadersModification.java Updated import statements and request factory initialization using ClientHttpRequestFactoryBuilder
rag/.../TestLlmRagWithSpringAiApplication.java Removed @TestConfiguration and pgvectorContainer() method
rag/.../AbstractIntegrationTest.java Removed ObjectMapper and MockMvc dependencies, updated Spring Boot test configuration
rag/.../ContainersConfig.java New test configuration class added with pgvectorContainer() method for PostgreSQL container

Poem

🐰 In the realm of code, a rabbit's delight,
Containers dance, configurations take flight
Spring AI's magic, refactored with care
Testing made simple, beyond compare!
A new config springs, clean and bright 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
rag/rag-springai-openai-llm/src/test/java/com/learning/ai/llmragwithspringai/config/ContainersConfig.java (1)

14-15: Expand container customization if needed.
Currently, the PostgreSQL container is instantiated with default settings. If your tests require additional configurations (e.g., environment variables, initialization scripts, etc.), consider chaining methods like .withInitScript("init_postgres.sql") or .withDatabaseName("testdb").

rag/rag-springai-openai-llm/src/main/java/com/learning/ai/llmragwithspringai/config/ResponseHeadersModification.java (1)

36-36: Potential overhead of wrapping BufferingClientHttpRequestFactory with full response logging.

While ClientHttpRequestFactoryBuilder.detect().build() is a handy one-liner, keep in mind that you are buffering and logging entire request and response bodies. This can significantly impact performance and memory usage for large payloads. Consider:

  • Adding safeguards or size limits for logs.
  • Using specialized or truncated logging for production environments.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2e8664e and 605cff5.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • rag/rag-springai-openai-llm/pom.xml is excluded by !**/*.xml
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • rag/rag-springai-openai-llm/src/main/java/com/learning/ai/llmragwithspringai/config/ResponseHeadersModification.java (2 hunks)
  • rag/rag-springai-openai-llm/src/test/java/com/learning/ai/llmragwithspringai/TestLlmRagWithSpringAiApplication.java (1 hunks)
  • rag/rag-springai-openai-llm/src/test/java/com/learning/ai/llmragwithspringai/config/AbstractIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
  • rag/rag-springai-openai-llm/src/test/java/com/learning/ai/llmragwithspringai/config/ContainersConfig.java (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
rag/rag-springai-openai-llm/src/test/java/com/learning/ai/llmragwithspringai/config/ContainersConfig.java (2)

3-7: Consider verifying dependencies and version pinning.
While these imports are consistent with the new container-based test approach, ensure the pgvector/pgvector:pg17 docker image is pinned to a stable tag or version that you trust and verify that no security patches or major version changes are pending.


9-9: Using proxyBeanMethods = false is perfectly suitable for test configurations.
This setting avoids creating CGLIB proxies for test-related beans, optimizing startup times and memory usage.

rag/rag-springai-openai-llm/src/test/java/com/learning/ai/llmragwithspringai/TestLlmRagWithSpringAiApplication.java (2)

3-3: Clean import aligns with modular configuration.

The introduction of ContainersConfig centralizes container setup and helps keep test configurations decoupled from the main application. This import is consistent with the new approach, improving maintainability.


10-10: Ensure that container configuration loads properly in test context.

By chaining .with(ContainersConfig.class), you preserve the main application setup while injecting the container configuration for testing. Confirm that this approach doesn’t inadvertently override any existing context configurations or beans.

rag/rag-springai-openai-llm/src/main/java/com/learning/ai/llmragwithspringai/config/ResponseHeadersModification.java (1)

12-12: Good import for simplifying request factory creation.

Using ClientHttpRequestFactoryBuilder helps streamline factory detection and instantiation. This approach is more concise compared to manually configuring detection logic.

rag/rag-springai-openai-llm/src/test/java/com/learning/ai/llmragwithspringai/config/AbstractIntegrationTest.java (1)

9-10: Evaluate concurrency handling with container-based tests.

Referencing ContainersConfig.class is a concise way to unify container-based configurations. Please confirm that concurrency and resource usage are effectively handled if multiple tests run in parallel. If you rely on a single container instance, consider using container reusability or running separate containers for each test class to avoid potential conflicts and port collisions.

Run the following script to confirm no leftover references to the old test configuration class remain in the codebase:

✅ Verification successful

Container configuration is properly handled for concurrent test execution

The implementation shows good practices for container management:

  • ContainersConfig uses proxyBeanMethods = false which ensures new container instances
  • @TestConfiguration properly scopes the container configuration
  • @ServiceConnection handles container lifecycle automatically
  • Test class uses @TestInstance(TestInstance.Lifecycle.PER_CLASS) ensuring proper test isolation

The PostgreSQL container is properly configured and Spring Boot's test container support will handle concurrent test execution safely. No issues were found regarding container reuse or potential port conflicts.

As for the obsolete references check, the TestLlmRagWithSpringAiApplication class exists in both the ollama and openai modules but appears to be used appropriately as test utilities rather than conflicting configurations.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search the repository for obsolete references to `TestLlmRagWithSpringAiApplication`
rg 'TestLlmRagWithSpringAiApplication'

Length of output: 368


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of ContainersConfig to understand container configuration and potential concurrency handling
ast-grep --pattern 'class ContainersConfig {
  $$$
}'

# Search for test classes extending AbstractIntegrationTest to understand test hierarchy
rg -l "extends\s+AbstractIntegrationTest"

# Look for container configuration and lifecycle management
rg -l "@Container|@ServiceConnection" --type java

Length of output: 1198


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of ContainersConfig in the specific module to understand container setup
cat rag/rag-springai-openai-llm/src/test/java/com/learning/ai/llmragwithspringai/config/ContainersConfig.java

# Check the integration test to understand test execution patterns
cat rag/rag-springai-openai-llm/src/test/java/com/learning/ai/llmragwithspringai/LlmRagWithSpringAiApplicationIntTest.java

Length of output: 5027

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 605cff5 and 1328f0d.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • rag/rag-springai-openai-llm/pom.xml is excluded by !**/*.xml
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • rag/rag-springai-openai-llm/src/main/java/com/learning/ai/llmragwithspringai/config/ResponseHeadersModification.java (2 hunks)
  • rag/rag-springai-openai-llm/src/test/java/com/learning/ai/llmragwithspringai/TestLlmRagWithSpringAiApplication.java (1 hunks)
  • rag/rag-springai-openai-llm/src/test/java/com/learning/ai/llmragwithspringai/config/AbstractIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
  • rag/rag-springai-openai-llm/src/test/java/com/learning/ai/llmragwithspringai/config/ContainersConfig.java (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
  • rag/rag-springai-openai-llm/src/test/java/com/learning/ai/llmragwithspringai/TestLlmRagWithSpringAiApplication.java
  • rag/rag-springai-openai-llm/src/test/java/com/learning/ai/llmragwithspringai/config/ContainersConfig.java
  • rag/rag-springai-openai-llm/src/main/java/com/learning/ai/llmragwithspringai/config/ResponseHeadersModification.java
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Run Unit & Integration Tests (temurin, 21)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
rag/rag-springai-openai-llm/src/test/java/com/learning/ai/llmragwithspringai/config/AbstractIntegrationTest.java (1)

10-10: Verify test coverage after removing MockMvc configuration

The removal of @AutoConfigureMockMvc and MockMvc dependencies suggests a change in testing strategy. Ensure that all HTTP endpoint tests are still properly covered.

✅ Verification successful

Module-specific testing approach change is properly handled

The removal of MockMvc configuration in this module is intentional and doesn't affect the test coverage, as:

  • The module maintains proper test configuration with @SpringBootTest
  • No broken MockMvc dependencies are found in this module
  • Other modules continue to use their respective testing approaches independently
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for alternative HTTP testing approaches

# Look for alternative HTTP testing configurations
echo "Checking for alternative HTTP testing approaches:"
rg -l "RestTemplate|WebTestClient|TestRestTemplate" src/test/

# Check for any remaining MockMvc usage that might be broken
echo "Checking for potentially broken MockMvc usage:"
rg "MockMvc" src/test/

Length of output: 398


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# First, find all test files
echo "Finding test files:"
fd -t f "Test.java|IT.java" 

# Then check for HTTP testing approaches in the found files
echo -e "\nChecking for HTTP testing configurations:"
rg -l "RestTemplate|WebTestClient|TestRestTemplate|@SpringBootTest|@WebMvcTest"

# Check for MockMvc related code
echo -e "\nChecking for MockMvc related code:"
rg "MockMvc|@AutoConfigureMockMvc"

Length of output: 3954

@Autowired
protected ObjectMapper objectMapper;
}
classes = {ContainersConfig.class})
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

TestQueryController needs MockMvc configuration after base class changes

The removal of MockMvc from AbstractIntegrationTest will break TestQueryController as it relies on the mockMvc field. The test needs to be updated with its own MockMvc configuration.

  • Add @AutoConfigureMockMvc to TestQueryController
  • Add @Autowired MockMvc field declaration
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify ContainersConfig implementation and its impact on tests

The test configuration has been moved to ContainersConfig. Let's verify its implementation and ensure all necessary container configurations are present.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify ContainersConfig implementation and its usage

# Check ContainersConfig implementation
echo "Checking ContainersConfig implementation:"
rg -A 10 "class ContainersConfig" 

# Check if any tests might be broken by this change
echo "Checking tests that extend AbstractIntegrationTest:"
rg "extends\s+AbstractIntegrationTest"

Length of output: 1899


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the dependent tests have their own MockMvc setup
echo "Checking MockMvc usage in dependent tests:"
rg -A 5 "MockMvc|@AutoConfigureMockMvc" \
    "rag/rag-springai-ollama-llm/src/test/java/com/learning/ai/llmragwithspringai/LlmRagWithSpringAiApplicationIntTest.java" \
    "rag/rag-springai-openai-llm/src/test/java/com/learning/ai/llmragwithspringai/LlmRagWithSpringAiApplicationIntTest.java" \
    "embeddingstores/pgvector-langchain4j/src/test/java/com/learning/ai/controller/TestQueryController.java"

# Check test class configurations
echo -e "\nChecking test class configurations:"
rg -B 2 -A 2 "class.*extends AbstractIntegrationTest" \
    "rag/rag-springai-ollama-llm/src/test/java/com/learning/ai/llmragwithspringai/LlmRagWithSpringAiApplicationIntTest.java" \
    "rag/rag-springai-openai-llm/src/test/java/com/learning/ai/llmragwithspringai/LlmRagWithSpringAiApplicationIntTest.java" \
    "embeddingstores/pgvector-langchain4j/src/test/java/com/learning/ai/controller/TestQueryController.java"

Length of output: 4347


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check complete TestQueryController implementation for MockMvc setup
echo "Checking TestQueryController implementation:"
cat "embeddingstores/pgvector-langchain4j/src/test/java/com/learning/ai/controller/TestQueryController.java"

# Check if there's a separate test configuration in the same package
echo -e "\nChecking for additional test configurations:"
fd -e java -p "Test.*Config|.*TestConfig" "embeddingstores/pgvector-langchain4j/src/test"

Length of output: 1925

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant