-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
centralize build stamp logic #135281
Open
onur-ozkan
wants to merge
13
commits into
rust-lang:master
Choose a base branch
from
onur-ozkan:build-stamps
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
centralize build stamp logic #135281
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9aed5bb
implement `BuildStamp` that is stricter impl for build stamps
onur-ozkan dc8a8d9
use `BuildStamp` instead of std paths and strings
onur-ozkan e9694a1
migrate `HashStamp` to `BuildStamp`
onur-ozkan 7b72325
migrate helper stamp functions
onur-ozkan 47a4f0f
migrate `Builder::clear_if_dirty`
onur-ozkan a697d15
document `build_stamp` implementation
onur-ozkan a23e7db
add test coverage for `build_stamp` implementation
onur-ozkan e359f3c
migrate `generate_smart_stamp_hash`
onur-ozkan a685c6b
fix compiler errors
onur-ozkan 2cee8c0
fix an invalid prefix usage on enzyme
onur-ozkan e9d3ff7
add coverage for `BuildStamp::with_prefix`
onur-ozkan b21d860
migrate `program_out_of_date` to `BuildStamp::is_up_to_date`
onur-ozkan 51fd08e
auto label `A-bootstrap-stamp`
onur-ozkan File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changes in 7b72325 for check.rs will somehow mangle prefix names?
Before:
.libstd-check-stamp
After:
.check-libstd-stamp
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I did this intentionally to keep it simple by avoiding the need to duplicate similar functions. I assume this rename shouldn't cause any issues. Maybe, at worst, it might require running
x clean
after pulling these changes to remove old build artifacts.