Compiler v2 #6
Compiler v2 #6
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant modifications to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Developer
participant CargoToml
participant Dependencies
participant HashModule
Developer->>CargoToml: Update workspace configuration
CargoToml->>Dependencies: Add new cryptographic libraries
Dependencies-->>CargoToml: Confirm additions
CargoToml-->>Developer: Configuration updated
Developer->>HashModule: Implement cryptographic hash functions
HashModule-->>Developer: Hash functions ready for use
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (16)
crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/compilation/cross_test.rs (1)
1-29: LGTM! Consider adding more test cases.The code changes are approved. The file contains a compilation test that ensures the cryptographic primitives can be used together. The code looks correct and follows best practices.
As an improvement, consider adding more test cases to cover different scenarios and edge cases.
crates/aptos-crypto/benches/parse-hash-benches.sh (1)
1-47: LGTM, but consider adding more error handling and validation.The script is well-structured and follows good practices such as:
- Using
set -eto exit on errors.- Handling errors gracefully by checking the number of arguments and the existence of the benchmark file.
- Using
jqto parse the JSON file, which is a good choice for processing JSON data in bash.However, the script could be improved by adding more error handling and validation, such as:
- Validating the hash function name to ensure it is one of the supported values.
- Checking if the output file is writable before writing to it.
- Handling the case where the benchmark file exists but does not contain the expected JSON data.
Tools
Shellcheck
[warning] 5-5: Quote this to prevent word splitting.
(SC2046)
crypto/src/hash.rs (1)
4-5: Inconsistent Import Sources forCryptoHashandCryptoHasherThe import sources for
CryptoHashandCryptoHasherare inconsistent across the codebase. Whilecrypto/src/hash.rscorrectly imports fromaptos_crypto, the filecrypto/tests/crypto_hash_test.rsstill imports fromstarcoin_crypto. This inconsistency could lead to unexpected behavior or conflicts. Please review and update the import statements to ensure consistency across the codebase.
crypto/tests/crypto_hash_test.rs: Imports fromstarcoin_cryptoinstead ofaptos_crypto.Analysis chain
Verify the impact of the change on the codebase.
The import statements for
CryptoHashandCryptoHashertypes have been modified to replace thecrypto_macrocrate with theaptos_cryptocrate. This change could affect the functionality of any hashing operations that rely on these types.Please run the following script to verify the usage of these types throughout the codebase and ensure that the change does not introduce any breaking changes:
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of CryptoHash and CryptoHasher types. # Test: Search for the usage of CryptoHash and CryptoHasher types. # Expect: Only occurrences from the aptos_crypto crate. rg --type rust -w $'(CryptoHash|CryptoHasher)'Length of output: 20719
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the import source of CryptoHash and CryptoHasher types. # Search for import statements of CryptoHash and CryptoHasher to ensure they are from aptos_crypto. rg --type rust -w 'use .*::hash::{.*CryptoHash.*,.*CryptoHasher.*};' -A 2Length of output: 221
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the import source of CryptoHash and CryptoHasher types. # Corrected regex pattern to search for import statements of CryptoHash and CryptoHasher. rg --type rust -w 'use [a-zA-Z_]+::hash::{[^}]*CryptoHash[^}]*, [^}]*CryptoHasher[^}]*};'Length of output: 266
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the import source of CryptoHash and CryptoHasher types. # Simplified regex pattern to search for import statements of CryptoHash and CryptoHasher. rg --type rust 'use [a-zA-Z_]+::hash::\{.*CryptoHash.*CryptoHasher.*\};'Length of output: 536
crates/aptos-crypto/src/compat.rs (1)
23-23: LGTM!The static assertion is a good practice to ensure the struct implements all the necessary traits at compile-time.
Consider adding a comment above the assertion to explain its purpose. For example:
// Ensure that Sha3_256 implements all the sub-traits required for the Digest trait alias. static_assertions::assert_impl_all!(Sha3_256: Digest);crates/aptos-crypto/README.md (1)
9-9: Address the following suggestions to improve the consistency and readability of the README file:
- Add a punctuation mark after "traits from" in line 9:
-To enforce type-safety for signature schemes, we rely on traits from [`traits.rs`](src/traits.rs) and [`validatable.rs`](src/validatable.rs). +To enforce type-safety for signature schemes, we rely on traits from: [`traits.rs`](src/traits.rs) and [`validatable.rs`](src/validatable.rs).
- Use dashes instead of plus signs for the unordered list items in lines 16, 17, 19, 20, 22, 24, 25, 29, and 30:
- + Standardized in [FIPS 202](https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/FIPS/NIST.FIPS.202.pdf) + - Standardized in [FIPS 202](https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/FIPS/NIST.FIPS.202.pdf)
- Fix the indentation of the unordered list item in line 56:
- - This crate historically had support for (a different) BLS12-381, [EC-VRF](https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-goldbe-vrf-01.html#rfc.section.5), and [SLIP-0010](https://github.com/satoshilabs/slips/blob/master/slip-0010.md), though were removed due to lack of use. The last git revision before the removal is 00301524. + - This crate historically had support for (a different) BLS12-381, [EC-VRF](https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-goldbe-vrf-01.html#rfc.section.5), and [SLIP-0010](https://github.com/satoshilabs/slips/blob/master/slip-0010.md), though were removed due to lack of use. The last git revision before the removal is 00301524.
- Specify a language for the fenced code block in line 37:
-``` +```text crypto/src ├── bls12-381/ # Boneh-Lynn-Shacham (BLS) signatures over (Barreto-Lynn-Scott) BLS12-381 curves ├── unit_tests/ # Unit tests ├── lib.rs ├── ed25519/ # Ed25519 implementation of the signing/verification API in traits.rs ├── hash.rs # Hash function (SHA-3) ├── hkdf.rs # HKDF implementation ├── multi_ed25519.rs # MultiEd25519 implementation of the signing/verification API in traits.rs ├── noise.rs # Noise Protocol Framework implementation ├── test_utils.rs ├── traits.rs # Traits for safer implementations of signature schemes ├── validatable.rs # Traits for deferring validation of group elements (e.g., public keys, signatures) └── x25519.rs # X25519 implementationAlso applies to: 16-30, 37-37, 56-56
Tools
LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~9-~9: A punctuation mark might be missing here.
Context: ...nature schemes, we rely on traits fromtraits.rsand [`validat...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION)
crates/aptos-crypto/benches/bulletproofs.rs (2)
1-3: Add a file-level comment explaining the purpose of the benchmark tests.Consider adding a comment at the beginning of the file to provide an overview of the benchmark tests and any setup required to run them.
+// This file contains benchmark tests for the bulletproofs library. +// To run the benchmarks, use the following command: +// `cargo bench --package aptos-crypto --features bulletproofs` + // Copyright © Aptos Foundation // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
28-43: Consider extracting the benchmark IDs and other common parameters into constants.To improve readability and maintainability, consider defining constants for the benchmark IDs and other common parameters used across multiple benchmark tests.
+const RANGE_PROVE_BENCHMARK_ID: &str = "range_prove"; +const RANGE_VERIFY_BENCHMARK_ID: &str = "range_verify"; +const RANGE_PROOF_DESERIALIZE_BENCHMARK_ID: &str = "range_proof_deserialize"; + +const BENCHMARK_GROUP_NAME: &str = "bulletproofs"; + fn bench_group(c: &mut Criterion) { - let mut group = c.benchmark_group("bulletproofs"); + let mut group = c.benchmark_group(BENCHMARK_GROUP_NAME); for num_bits in [32, 64] { range_proof_deserialize(&mut group, num_bits); } for batch_size in [1, 2] { for num_bits in [32, 64] { range_prove(&mut group, num_bits, batch_size); range_verify(&mut group, num_bits, batch_size); } } group.finish(); }crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/cross_test.rs (2)
1-3: Add a file-level comment explaining the purpose of the unit tests.Consider adding a comment at the beginning of the file to provide an overview of the unit tests and the scenarios they cover.
+// This file contains unit tests for the crypto library. +// The tests cover different combinations of key types and signing schemes +// to ensure type safety and correct behavior. + // Copyright © Aptos Foundation // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
67-120: Consider adding more test cases to cover additional scenarios.The current tests cover important scenarios, but you may want to add more test cases to further validate the behavior of the crypto library. Some additional scenarios to consider:
- Test cases with invalid or malformed keys and signatures.
- Test cases with different message types and lengths.
- Test cases that mix and match key types and signing schemes in more complex ways.
crates/aptos-crypto/benches/noise.rs (2)
22-22: Add a comment explaining the purpose of theMSG_SIZEconstant.Consider adding a comment to clarify the purpose and significance of the
MSG_SIZEconstant used in the benchmarks.+// MSG_SIZE represents the size of the message used in the transport benchmarks. +// It is set to 4096 bytes to simulate a typical message size. const MSG_SIZE: usize = 4096;
24-129: Consider extracting the benchmark IDs and other common parameters into constants.To improve readability and maintainability, consider defining constants for the benchmark IDs and other common parameters used across multiple benchmark tests.
+const NOISE_HANDSHAKE_BENCHMARK_GROUP: &str = "noise-handshake"; +const NOISE_TRANSPORT_BENCHMARK_GROUP: &str = "noise-transport"; + +const CONNECT_BENCHMARK_ID: &str = "connect"; +const AES_GCM_THROUGHPUT_BENCHMARK_ID: &str = "AES-GCM throughput"; + fn benchmarks(c: &mut Criterion) { // bench the handshake - let mut group = c.benchmark_group("noise-handshake"); + let mut group = c.benchmark_group(NOISE_HANDSHAKE_BENCHMARK_GROUP); group.throughput(Throughput::Elements(1)); - group.bench_function("connect", |b| { + group.bench_function(CONNECT_BENCHMARK_ID, |b| { // setup keys first let mut rng = ::rand::rngs::StdRng::from_seed(TEST_SEED); let initiator_static = x25519::PrivateKey::generate(&mut rng); // ... }); group.finish(); - let mut transport_group = c.benchmark_group("noise-transport"); + let mut transport_group = c.benchmark_group(NOISE_TRANSPORT_BENCHMARK_GROUP); transport_group.throughput(Throughput::Bytes(MSG_SIZE as u64 * 2)); - transport_group.bench_function("AES-GCM throughput", |b| { + transport_group.bench_function(AES_GCM_THROUGHPUT_BENCHMARK_ID, |b| { let mut buffer_msg = [0u8; MSG_SIZE + AES_GCM_TAGLEN]; // setup keys first let mut rng = ::rand::rngs::StdRng::from_seed(TEST_SEED); // ... }); transport_group.finish(); }crates/aptos-crypto/benches/generate-gas-csv.sh (1)
3-3: Address shellcheck warnings.Shellcheck reported the following warnings for this line:
- SC2164: Use
cd ... || exitorcd ... || returnin case cd fails.- SC2046: Quote
$0to prevent word splitting.To make the script more robust, apply this diff:
-scriptdir=$(cd $(dirname $0); pwd -P) +scriptdir=$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" || exit; pwd -P)Tools
Shellcheck
[warning] 3-3: Use 'cd ... || exit' or 'cd ... || return' in case cd fails.
(SC2164)
[warning] 3-3: Quote this to prevent word splitting.
(SC2046)
crates/aptos-crypto/src/bls12381/bls12381_keys.rs (2)
171-177: Add a comment about the purpose of theGenesistrait implementation.Consider adding a comment explaining why the
Genesistrait is implemented forPrivateKeyand what thegenesisfunction is meant to return. This will help readers understand the purpose of this implementation.
76-86: Consider adding a test for thePublicKey::aggregatefunction.The
PublicKey::aggregatefunction is an important operation for aggregating multiple public keys. Consider adding a test to ensure it behaves as expected, especially around handling invalid public keys that haven't had their proofs-of-possession verified.crates/aptos-crypto/src/bls12381/mod.rs (1)
1-430: Code looks good, just a minor documentation suggestion.The code follows best practices and the documentation is very detailed with clear examples.
One minor suggestion: Consider adding a comment referring to where the actual unit tests are located, since the documentation mentions generating unit tests but they aren't included directly in this file.
crates/aptos-crypto/src/multi_ed25519.rs (1)
1-666: Code looks good, just a minor suggestion to improve readability.The multi-signature and threshold signature implementations follow best practices and are well-structured. The inclusion of unit tests is great.
One small nitpick to improve readability:
Consider adding a few more comments explaining what the bit manipulations are doing in the bitmap helper functions (bitmap_set_bit,bitmap_get_bit, etc). While the code is correct, a future reader would benefit from a little more context there.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (80)
- Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto-derive/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto-derive/src/hasher.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto-derive/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto-derive/src/unions.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/README.md (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/benches/ark_bls12_381.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/benches/ark_bn254.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/benches/bench_utils.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/benches/bls12381.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/benches/bulletproofs.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/benches/ed25519.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/benches/generate-bench-data.sh (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/benches/generate-gas-csv.sh (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/benches/hash.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/benches/noise.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/benches/parse-bench.sh (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/benches/parse-hash-benches.sh (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/benches/poseidon_bn254.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/benches/ristretto255.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/benches/secp256k1.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/proptest-regressions/unit_tests/ed25519_test.txt (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/proptest-regressions/unit_tests/p256_test.txt (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/proptest-regressions/validatable.txt (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/asymmetric_encryption/elgamal_curve25519_aes256_gcm.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/asymmetric_encryption/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/bls12381/bls12381_keys.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/bls12381/bls12381_pop.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/bls12381/bls12381_sigs.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/bls12381/bls12381_validatable.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/bls12381/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/bulletproofs/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/compat.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/ed25519/ed25519_keys.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/ed25519/ed25519_sigs.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/ed25519/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/elgamal/curve25519.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/elgamal/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/encoding_type.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/error.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/hash.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/hkdf.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/multi_ed25519.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/noise.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/poseidon_bn254/alt_fr.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/poseidon_bn254/keyless.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/poseidon_bn254/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/secp256k1_ecdsa.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/secp256r1_ecdsa/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/secp256r1_ecdsa/secp256r1_ecdsa_keys.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/secp256r1_ecdsa/secp256r1_ecdsa_sigs.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/test_utils.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/traits.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/bcs_test.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/bls12381_test.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/bulletproofs_test.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/compat_test.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/compilation/cross_test.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/compilation/cross_test_trait_obj.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/compilation/cross_test_trait_obj_pub.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/compilation/cross_test_trait_obj_sig.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/compilation/small_kdf.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/cross_test.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/cryptohasher.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/ed25519_test.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/hash_test.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/hkdf_test.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/multi_ed25519_test.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/noise_test.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/secp256k1_ecdsa_test.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/secp256r1_ecdsa_test.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/validatable.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/x25519.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/test_vectors/noise_cacophony.txt (1 hunks)
- crypto/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- crypto/src/hash.rs (1 hunks)
- crypto/src/keygen.rs (3 hunks)
Files not processed due to max files limit (4)
- crypto/src/lib.rs
- crypto/src/multi_ed25519/multi_shard.rs
- rust-toolchain
- rust-toolchain.toml
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (9)
- crates/aptos-crypto-derive/Cargo.toml
- crates/aptos-crypto/Cargo.toml
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/bulletproofs/mod.rs
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/error.rs
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/compilation/cross_test_trait_obj.rs
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/compilation/cross_test_trait_obj_pub.rs
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/compilation/cross_test_trait_obj_sig.rs
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/compilation/small_kdf.rs
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/mod.rs
Additional context used
LanguageTool
crates/aptos-crypto/proptest-regressions/unit_tests/ed25519_test.txt
[uncategorized] ~2-~2: Use a comma before “and” if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
Context: ... in the past. It is # automatically read and these particular cases re-run before an...(COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE_2)
crates/aptos-crypto/proptest-regressions/validatable.txt
[uncategorized] ~2-~2: Use a comma before “and” if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
Context: ... in the past. It is # automatically read and these particular cases re-run before an...(COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE_2)
crates/aptos-crypto/README.md
[uncategorized] ~9-~9: A punctuation mark might be missing here.
Context: ...nature schemes, we rely on traits fromtraits.rsand [`validat...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION)
crates/aptos-crypto/proptest-regressions/unit_tests/p256_test.txt
[uncategorized] ~2-~2: Use a comma before “and” if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
Context: ... in the past. It is # automatically read and these particular cases re-run before an...(COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE_2)
Gitleaks
crates/aptos-crypto/proptest-regressions/unit_tests/ed25519_test.txt
7-7: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
crates/aptos-crypto/proptest-regressions/validatable.txt
7-7: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
crates/aptos-crypto/src/ed25519/ed25519_sigs.rs
93-93: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
crates/aptos-crypto/src/x25519.rs
25-25: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
27-27: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
crates/aptos-crypto/src/ed25519/ed25519_keys.rs
247-247: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
270-270: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
Shellcheck
crates/aptos-crypto/benches/parse-bench.sh
[warning] 5-5: Quote this to prevent word splitting.
(SC2046)
[warning] 29-29: hash_func is referenced but not assigned.
(SC2154)
[warning] 29-29: n is referenced but not assigned.
(SC2154)
crates/aptos-crypto/benches/parse-hash-benches.sh
[warning] 5-5: Quote this to prevent word splitting.
(SC2046)
crates/aptos-crypto/benches/generate-bench-data.sh
[error] 1-1: Tips depend on target shell and yours is unknown. Add a shebang or a 'shell' directive.
(SC2148)
crates/aptos-crypto/benches/generate-gas-csv.sh
[warning] 3-3: Use 'cd ... || exit' or 'cd ... || return' in case cd fails.
(SC2164)
[warning] 3-3: Quote this to prevent word splitting.
(SC2046)
[warning] 27-27: hash_func is referenced but not assigned.
(SC2154)
Markdownlint
crates/aptos-crypto/README.md
16-16: Expected: dash; Actual: plus
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
17-17: Expected: dash; Actual: plus
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
19-19: Expected: dash; Actual: plus
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
20-20: Expected: dash; Actual: plus
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
22-22: Expected: dash; Actual: plus
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
24-24: Expected: dash; Actual: plus
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
25-25: Expected: dash; Actual: plus
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
29-29: Expected: dash; Actual: plus
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
30-30: Expected: dash; Actual: plus
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
56-56: Expected: 0; Actual: 1
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
37-37: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
Additional comments not posted (144)
crates/aptos-crypto/proptest-regressions/unit_tests/ed25519_test.txt (1)
1-7: LGTM!The file is a regression test case generated by proptest and does not contain any code that needs to be reviewed.
Tools
LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~2-~2: Use a comma before “and” if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
Context: ... in the past. It is # automatically read and these particular cases re-run before an...(COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE_2)
Gitleaks
7-7: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
crates/aptos-crypto/proptest-regressions/validatable.txt (1)
1-7: LGTM!The file is a regression test case generated by proptest and does not contain any code that needs to be reviewed.
Tools
LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~2-~2: Use a comma before “and” if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
Context: ... in the past. It is # automatically read and these particular cases re-run before an...(COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE_2)
Gitleaks
7-7: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
crates/aptos-crypto-derive/src/hasher.rs (1)
6-21: LGTM!The
camel_to_snakefunction correctly converts a camel-case string to snake-case and is well-optimized.crypto/Cargo.toml (1)
10-22: LGTM!The changes to the
Cargo.tomlfile look good. They reflect a shift towards a more modular and workspace-oriented dependency management approach, which can improve consistency across multiple packages within the workspace.Also applies to: 26-26
crates/aptos-crypto/src/lib.rs (1)
1-38: LGTM!The
lib.rsfile looks good. It's a well-organized library file exporting various cryptographic primitives and utilities. The module structure, re-exports, and inclusion of unit tests are all appropriate.crates/aptos-crypto/src/poseidon_bn254/alt_fr.rs (1)
1-36: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The file provides a custom finite field implementation that is compatible with the
ffcrate's traits. The conversions betweenAltFrandark_bn254::Frare implemented correctly. The code follows best practices and has no issues.crates/aptos-crypto/src/elgamal/curve25519.rs (1)
1-44: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The file provides a correct implementation of the ElGamal encryption scheme over Curve25519. The code follows best practices and has no issues. The unit test ensures that the implementation works as expected.
crates/aptos-crypto/src/asymmetric_encryption/mod.rs (1)
1-39: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
The
AsymmetricEncryptiontrait provides a clean and modular interface for defining asymmetric encryption schemes. The associated types and methods allow for flexibility in the implementation of the encryption scheme while providing a standard interface for key generation, encryption, and decryption.The
elgamal_curve25519_aes256_gcmmodule provides a specific implementation of theAsymmetricEncryptiontrait using well-known cryptographic primitives. The use of AES-256-GCM for encrypting the input and ElGamal over the group that supports ED25519 signatures for encrypting the symmetric key provides a secure and efficient asymmetric encryption scheme.crypto/src/keygen.rs (3)
33-35: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
39-39: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
45-47: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
crates/aptos-crypto/benches/secp256k1.rs (1)
1-47: LGTM!The new benchmark file looks good.
crates/aptos-crypto/test_vectors/noise_cacophony.txt (1)
1-41: LGTM!The new test vector file looks good.
crates/aptos-crypto/src/compat.rs (1)
15-18: LGTM!The doc comment clearly explains the purpose of the
Sha3_256struct.crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/compat_test.rs (1)
41-60: LGTM!The property-based testing approach using
proptestis effective in testing the compatibility ofcompat::Sha3_256andsha3::Sha3_256for random inputs.crates/aptos-crypto/src/ed25519/mod.rs (3)
1-32: LGTM!The code segment is well-documented and provides a clear example of how to use the API.
33-38: LGTM!The constants are correctly defined using the values from the
ed25519_daleklibrary.
40-55: LGTM!The code segment correctly defines the order of ed25519 and re-exports the key and signature types from submodules, following the best practices for organizing the code.
crates/aptos-crypto/src/elgamal/mod.rs (2)
1-36: LGTM!The
ElGamalFriendlyGrouptrait is well-defined and covers all the necessary operations for implementing ElGamal.
38-78: LGTM!The functions for key generation, encryption, and decryption are correctly implemented using the
ElGamalFriendlyGrouptrait. The test function ensures the correctness of the implementation.crates/aptos-crypto/benches/poseidon_bn254.rs (3)
1-27: LGTM!The code segment correctly sets up the benchmark group and configures the sample size, following the best practices for setting up benchmark groups.
29-51: LGTM!The function for benchmarking the Poseidon hash function using the
neptuneimplementation is correctly implemented and follows the best practices for benchmarking.
53-83: LGTM!The function for benchmarking the Poseidon hash function using the
arkimplementation is correctly implemented and follows the best practices for benchmarking. The benchmark group is correctly set up.Cargo.toml (3)
2-2: LGTM!The changes to the workspace configuration look good:
- Setting the resolver version to "2" is a significant update that can impact dependency management and compatibility checks across the crates.
- Adding
aptos-cryptoandaptos-crypto-deriveas new members to the workspace suggests an enhancement in functionality or modularization of the codebase, potentially allowing for more specialized cryptographic operations.Also applies to: 6-7
15-78: Verify the versions and sources of the new dependencies.The addition of the new dependencies under the
[workspace.dependencies]section looks good. The inclusion of various cryptographic libraries indicates a significant enhancement in cryptographic capabilities, likely aimed at improving security features or adding new functionalities to the project.However, please verify that the specific versions and sources (e.g., Git repositories) used for some of the dependencies are intentional and have been carefully reviewed.
89-90: Verify the stability and testing of the specific branch used for thex25519-dalekcrate.The addition of the
[patch.crates-io]section, specifying a patch for thex25519-dalekcrate to use a particular branch, reflects an active approach to dependency management and customization.Please ensure that the
zeroize_v1branch of thex25519-dalekcrate is stable and has been thoroughly tested before using it in production.crates/aptos-crypto/src/secp256r1_ecdsa/mod.rs (1)
1-64: LGTM!The module-level documentation is comprehensive and provides a clear overview of the ECDSA signature scheme over the NIST-P256 curve. The examples are helpful for users to quickly get started with using the API.
crates/aptos-crypto/README.md (1)
1-56: LGTM!The content of the README file is comprehensive and provides a good overview of the
aptos-cryptocrate. It covers the key aspects of the crate, including:
- The cryptographic primitives used in Aptos, such as hashing, signatures, and key derivation/generation.
- The traits used to enforce type-safety for signature schemes.
- The list of cryptographic algorithms used in Aptos.
- The organization of the crate and the changelog.
Great job on putting together a informative README file!
Tools
LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~9-~9: A punctuation mark might be missing here.
Context: ...nature schemes, we rely on traits fromtraits.rsand [`validat...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION)
Markdownlint
16-16: Expected: dash; Actual: plus
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
17-17: Expected: dash; Actual: plus
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
19-19: Expected: dash; Actual: plus
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
20-20: Expected: dash; Actual: plus
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
22-22: Expected: dash; Actual: plus
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
24-24: Expected: dash; Actual: plus
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
25-25: Expected: dash; Actual: plus
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
29-29: Expected: dash; Actual: plus
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
30-30: Expected: dash; Actual: plus
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
56-56: Expected: 0; Actual: 1
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
37-37: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/cryptohasher.rs (8)
16-20: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
22-23: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
26-31: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
33-38: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
49-64: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
66-82: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
84-90: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
101-128: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
crates/aptos-crypto/src/encoding_type.rs (6)
16-30: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
39-48: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
51-62: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
64-71: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
73-98: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
100-103: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
crates/aptos-crypto/benches/bench_utils.rs (2)
10-12: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
14-21: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/secp256k1_ecdsa_test.rs (4)
14-51: LGTM!The
basictest function is correctly implemented and covers the basic functionality of thesecp256k1_ecdsamodule. It tests that:
- A signature share computed on a message passes verification on the same message.
- A signature share computed on a message fails verification on a different message.
- A signature share fails verification under the wrong public key.
53-79: LGTM!The
serializationtest function is correctly implemented and covers the serialization and deserialization functionality of thesecp256k1_ecdsamodule. It tests the serialization and deserialization of:
- Signatures
- Private keys
- Public keys
81-112: LGTM!The
malleabilitytest function is correctly implemented and covers the malleability of signatures in thesecp256k1_ecdsamodule. It tests that:
- Negating the
scomponent of a signature results in a modified signature that fails verification.
114-121: LGTM!The
deserialization_failuretest function is correctly implemented and covers the deserialization failure of signatures, private keys, and public keys in thesecp256k1_ecdsamodule. It tests that:
- Passing invalid byte slices to the deserialization functions results in an error.
crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/bcs_test.rs (2)
16-47: LGTM!The
ed25519_bcs_materialtest function is correctly implemented and covers the BCS serialization and deserialization of Ed25519 public keys and signatures. It tests that:
- The serialized length of the public key and signature is correct.
- The serialization - deserialization of the public key and signature is stable and deterministic.
- The signature can be verified using the public key.
49-112: LGTM!The
multi_ed25519_bcs_materialtest function is correctly implemented and covers the BCS serialization and deserialization of MultiEd25519 public keys and signatures. It tests that:
- The serialized length of the public key and signature is correct.
- The serialization - deserialization of the public key and signature is stable and deterministic.
- The signature can be verified using the public key.
- The bitmap of the signature is correct.
crates/aptos-crypto/benches/ed25519.rs (5)
45-62: LGTM!The
sig_verify_structbenchmark function is correctly implemented and measures the time to verify a signature on a random message using an Ed25519 public key. It generates a random message and signature for each iteration of the benchmark.
64-82: LGTM!The
sig_verify_zero_bytesbenchmark function is correctly implemented and measures the time to verify a signature on an empty message using an Ed25519 public key. It generates a random signature for each iteration of the benchmark by signing a random message.
84-96: LGTM!The
small_subgroup_checkbenchmark function is correctly implemented and measures the time to check if an EdwardsPoint is in a small subgroup. It generates a random point for each iteration of the benchmark by multiplying the base point by a random scalar.
98-113: LGTM!The
pk_deserializebenchmark function is correctly implemented and measures the time to deserialize an Ed25519 public key from a sequence of bytes. It generates a random public key for each iteration of the benchmark by generating a random private key and converting it to a public key.
115-131: LGTM!The
sig_deserializebenchmark function is correctly implemented and measures the time to deserialize an Ed25519 signature from a sequence of bytes. It generates a random signature for each iteration of the benchmark by generating a random private key and signing a fixed message.crates/aptos-crypto/proptest-regressions/unit_tests/p256_test.txt (1)
1-14: Skipping review.This file is a proptest regression test file containing seeds for failure cases. It does not contain any code that needs to be reviewed.
Tools
LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~2-~2: Use a comma before “and” if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
Context: ... in the past. It is # automatically read and these particular cases re-run before an...(COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE_2)
crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/bulletproofs_test.rs (1)
1-100: Test code looks good.The file contains ignored tests for bulletproofs generation and verification. The test code seems to be correct and well-structured. No issues found.
crates/aptos-crypto/src/validatable.rs (1)
1-143: Code looks good!The
Validatetrait andValidatabletype are well-designed and documented. The code follows good practices and the trait implementations are straightforward. No issues found.crates/aptos-crypto/src/poseidon_bn254/mod.rs (1)
Line range hint
1-161: LGTM!The Poseidon-BN254 module is implemented correctly, well-documented, and has unit tests. The code changes are approved.
crates/aptos-crypto/src/asymmetric_encryption/elgamal_curve25519_aes256_gcm.rs (1)
1-168: LGTM!The ElGamalCurve25519Aes256Gcm module is implemented correctly, well-documented, and has unit tests. The code changes are approved.
crates/aptos-crypto/src/bls12381/bls12381_pop.rs (1)
1-158: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The implementation of proofs-of-possession for BLS12-381 keys looks good.
crates/aptos-crypto/src/bls12381/bls12381_validatable.rs (1)
1-196: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The implementation of the
Validatetrait for BLS12-381 public keys looks good.crates/aptos-crypto/src/secp256r1_ecdsa/secp256r1_ecdsa_sigs.rs (1)
1-195: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The implementation of traits for ECDSA signatures over Secp256r1 looks good.
crates/aptos-crypto/src/ed25519/ed25519_sigs.rs (2)
17-85: LGTM!The
Ed25519Signaturestruct and its associated functions are implemented correctly. The use of theed25519_daleklibrary is appropriate for handling Ed25519 signatures. The serialization and deserialization functions follow the expected behavior.
92-187: LGTM!The trait implementations for
Ed25519Signatureare comprehensive and follow the expected behavior. Theverifyandverify_arbitrary_msgfunctions perform the necessary checks for signature verification, including handling of malleability issues.Tools
Gitleaks
93-93: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/hash_test.rs (10)
14-28: LGTM!The
test_default_hasherfunction is implemented correctly and covers the expected behavior of the default hasher.
30-46: LGTM!The
test_primitive_typefunction is implemented correctly and covers the expected behavior of hashing primitive types.
48-66: LGTM!The
test_from_slicefunction is implemented correctly and covers the expected behavior of theHashValue::from_slicefunction, including error cases.
68-83: LGTM!The
test_random_with_rngfunction is implemented correctly and covers the expected behavior of theHashValue::random_with_rngfunction, ensuring consistent random hash generation with a seeded RNG.
85-111: LGTM!The
test_hash_value_iter_bitsfunction is implemented correctly and covers the expected behavior of theHashValue::iter_bitsfunction, verifying the correctness of the bit representation of a hash value.
113-129: LGTM!The
test_hash_value_iterator_exact_sizefunction is implemented correctly and covers the expected behavior of theExactSizeIteratorimplementation ofHashValue::iter_bits, verifying the correctness of the iterator'slenmethod.
131-139: LGTM!The
test_fmt_binaryfunction is implemented correctly and covers the expected behavior of the binary formatting ofHashValue, verifying the correctness of the binary representation of a hash value.
141-154: LGTM!The
test_get_nibblefunction is implemented correctly and covers the expected behavior of theHashValue::nibblefunction, verifying the correctness of retrieving nibbles from a hash value.
156-189: LGTM!The
test_common_prefix_bits_lenfunction is implemented correctly and covers the expected behavior of theHashValue::common_prefix_bits_lenfunction, verifying the correctness of determining the length of common prefix bits between hash values.
191-248: LGTM!The proptest-based tests are implemented correctly and provide additional coverage for various properties of
HashValue, ensuring the correctness of the implemented functionality.crates/aptos-crypto/benches/hash.rs (3)
24-52: LGTM!The
bench_groupfunction is implemented correctly and sets up the benchmark group appropriately, configuring the necessary parameters and calling the individual benchmark functions.
54-251: LGTM!The individual hash function benchmark functions are implemented correctly. They set up the input data, measure the performance of the respective hash functions, and verify the correctness of the output. The benchmarks cover a range of hash functions and provide valuable performance insights.
253-257: LGTM!The criterion benchmark setup is implemented correctly, defining the benchmark group and configuring the necessary settings.
crates/aptos-crypto/src/bls12381/bls12381_sigs.rs (5)
69-76: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
85-100: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
103-119: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
122-130: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
136-222: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/hkdf_test.rs (6)
10-24: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
28-45: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
48-80: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
90-120: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
123-153: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
163-185: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
crates/aptos-crypto/src/secp256r1_ecdsa/secp256r1_ecdsa_keys.rs (3)
68-72: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
85-92: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
99-252: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
crates/aptos-crypto/src/hkdf.rs (1)
1-199: LGTM!The HKDF implementation looks solid and closely follows RFC 5869. The documentation is detailed and provides helpful usage recommendations. The error handling using
HkdfErroris appropriate.Great job with this new crypto primitive implementation!
crates/aptos-crypto/src/secp256k1_ecdsa.rs (1)
1-293: LGTM!The Secp256k1 ECDSA implementation looks solid and secure:
- Disabling the cloning of private keys by default is a good security practice. The ability to enable it via feature flag provides flexibility when needed.
- The signature verification correctly checks for malleability attacks by rejecting high S values. This is important to prevent potential vulnerabilities.
- All the required traits are properly implemented for seamless integration with the rest of the crypto library.
Great work on this implementation!
crates/aptos-crypto/src/x25519.rs (2)
1-269: LGTM!The x25519 implementation looks good and provides the necessary functionality for Diffie-Hellman key exchange. The ability to deserialize from Ed25519 keys is a nice feature for interoperability with existing systems.
All the required traits are properly implemented, making it easy to use this module in the larger crypto library.
Great job on this implementation!
Tools
Gitleaks
25-25: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
27-27: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
25-25: Gitleaks findings are false positives.The lines flagged by gitleaks as potential API keys are false positives. The hex strings are example keys used in doc comments and unit tests. They do not represent any actual API keys or secrets.
No further action is needed.
Also applies to: 27-27
Tools
Gitleaks
25-25: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/secp256r1_ecdsa_test.rs (12)
1-5: LGTM!The copyright header and allow directive are good.
6-21: LGTM!The imports are relevant and required for the tests in this file.
22-23: LGTM!The
CryptoHashablestruct definition with derive macros looks good.
25-37: LGTM!The
test_private_key_deserialization_endiannesstest function is focused and checks an important property of private key deserialization.
39-49: LGTM!The
test_pub_key_deserializationproptest provides good coverage for public key deserialization and ensures compatibility with the RustCrypto implementation.
52-68: LGTM!The
test_keys_encodeproptest ensures that key pairs can be encoded and decoded correctly.
70-85: LGTM!The
test_batch_verifyproptest provides good coverage for the batch verification functionality and checks both the success and failure cases.
87-103: LGTM!The
test_keys_custom_serialisationproptest ensures that key pairs can be serialized and deserialized correctly using custom serialization.
105-115: LGTM!The
test_signature_verification_custom_serialisationproptest ensures that signatures can be verified correctly using custom serialization.
117-128: LGTM!The
test_signature_verification_from_arbitraryproptest ensures that signatures can be verified correctly for arbitrary messages.
130-141: LGTM!The
test_signature_verification_from_structproptest ensures that signatures can be verified correctly for aCryptoHashablestruct.
144-219: LGTM!The
test_signature_malleabilityproptest ensures that signatures are not malleable and non-canonical signatures are rejected.crates/aptos-crypto/benches/ristretto255.rs (1)
1-335: Looks good!The Ristretto255 benchmark tests look comprehensive and well-structured. No issues or suggestions.
crates/aptos-crypto/src/ed25519/ed25519_keys.rs (1)
247-247: Gitleaks hints are false positives.The lines flagged by Gitleaks (247, 270) are trait bounds for the
PublicKeyandVerifyingKeytraits. They do not actually contain any API keys. These hints can be safely ignored as false positives.Also applies to: 270-270
Tools
Gitleaks
247-247: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
crates/aptos-crypto/src/traits.rs (1)
1-328: LGTM!The code changes in this file are approved. The file defines various traits for cryptographic primitives in a well-structured and well-documented manner. It follows Rust best practices and conventions.
crates/aptos-crypto/benches/bls12381.rs (1)
1-422: LGTM!The code changes in this file are approved. The file contains comprehensive benchmark tests for BLS12-381 cryptographic operations. The benchmarks are well-organized, use appropriate tools like
criterionandrand, and include necessary assertions. The code follows best practices and is easy to understand.crates/aptos-crypto/src/poseidon_bn254/keyless.rs (1)
1-393: LGTM!The code changes in this file are approved. The file implements keyless-specific domain-separated hash functions from Poseidon scalar hashing. The code is well-structured, follows Rust best practices, and includes appropriate error handling. The functions are properly documented, and unit tests are included to verify correctness. No major issues were found.
crates/aptos-crypto/benches/ark_bn254.rs (1)
1-552: Comprehensive benchmarks for theark_bn254crate. No major issues identified.This file contains a comprehensive set of benchmark functions for various cryptographic operations provided by the
ark_bn254crate, such as:
- Field arithmetic operations for
Fr,Fq, andFq12types- Group operations for
G1Affine,G1Projective,G2Affine, andG2Projectivetypes- Pairing and multi-pairing operations
- Groth16 verification
- Multi-scalar multiplication for G1 and G2
The benchmarks cover a wide range of scenarios and provide valuable insights into the performance characteristics of the
ark_bn254crate.Some minor observations and suggestions:
- Consider adding a brief description or documentation for each benchmark function to provide more context about what is being measured.
- Ensure that the benchmarks are run with a sufficient number of iterations and on representative input sizes to obtain reliable and meaningful results.
- Consider adding benchmarks for any additional operations or scenarios that are relevant to your specific use case of the
ark_bn254crate.Overall, the file is well-structured, follows best practices for writing benchmark code, and provides a comprehensive set of benchmarks for the
ark_bn254crate. No major issues or concerns were identified during the review.crates/aptos-crypto-derive/src/lib.rs (1)
1-477: Comprehensive set of derive macros for crypto operations. No major issues identified.This file contains a set of derive macros for various crypto-related traits and operations, such as:
SilentDisplayandSilentDebugfor eliding sensitive information in debug outputDeserializeKeyandSerializeKeyfor custom deserialization and serialization of crypto keysDereffor deriving theDereftraitValidCryptoMaterial,PublicKey,PrivateKey,VerifyingKey,SigningKey, andSignaturefor deriving crypto-related traits on enum typesCryptoHasherfor defining domain-separated hashersBCSCryptoHashfor deriving theCryptoHashtrait for BCS-serializable typesThe derive macros are well-documented and provide a convenient way to automatically derive the necessary traits and implementations for crypto-related types.
Some minor observations and suggestions:
- Consider adding more detailed documentation or examples for each derive macro to help users understand their purpose and usage better.
- Ensure that the generated code is properly tested and covers all possible scenarios and edge cases.
- Consider adding compile-time checks or validation to ensure that the derive macros are used correctly and with the appropriate types.
Overall, the file provides a comprehensive set of derive macros for crypto operations, which can greatly reduce the amount of boilerplate code needed when working with crypto-related types. The macros are well-structured, follow best practices for macro design, and include appropriate error handling and validation. No major issues or concerns were identified during the review.
crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/noise_test.rs (3)
13-107: Comprehensive test for the basic Noise handshake process.The
simple_handshakefunction tests the basic Noise handshake process between an initiator and a responder. It covers the following scenarios:
- Initiating a connection and sending the first message
- Responding to the client and finalizing the connection
- Exchanging messages between the initiator and responder after the handshake
The test uses both the
initiate_connection/finalize_connectionandparse_client_init_message/respond_to_clientAPIs, ensuring that both ways of performing the handshake are tested.Some observations and suggestions:
- The test covers the happy path scenario well, but it could be improved by adding more edge cases and error scenarios, such as testing with invalid keys, incorrect prologue, or malformed messages.
- Consider adding assertions for the exchanged payloads to ensure that they match the expected values.
- The test could be made more readable by extracting some of the repeated code into helper functions or using more descriptive variable names.
Overall, the
simple_handshakefunction provides a good test for the basic Noise handshake process, covering the essential scenarios and using both available APIs. The test could be further improved by adding more edge cases and error scenarios to increase the test coverage and confidence in the implementation.
109-304: Thorough test of the Noise implementation against known test vectors.The
test_vectorsfunction tests the Noise implementation against known test vectors from the Cacophony library. It covers the following scenarios:
- Initiating a connection and sending the first message
- Responding to the client and finalizing the connection
- Exchanging post-handshake messages between the initiator and responder
The test uses both the
initiate_connection/finalize_connectionandparse_client_init_message/respond_to_clientAPIs, ensuring that both ways of performing the handshake are tested.The test vectors are loaded from an external file and parsed using serde. The test then iterates over the test vectors, performing the handshake and message exchange steps, and comparing the results against the expected values from the test vectors.
Some observations and suggestions:
- The test provides a thorough verification of the Noise implementation against known test vectors, increasing the confidence in the correctness of the implementation.
- The test could be improved by adding more test vectors, covering different scenarios and edge cases, to further increase the test coverage.
- Consider adding more assertions or logging statements to provide better visibility into the intermediate steps and values during the test execution.
- The test could be made more maintainable by extracting some of the repeated code into helper functions or using more descriptive variable names.
Overall, the
test_vectorsfunction provides a comprehensive test of the Noise implementation against known test vectors, ensuring that the implementation behaves correctly in various scenarios. The test is well-structured and follows the steps outlined in the test vectors closely. The use of external test vectors increases the reliability and thoroughness of the test.
320-532: Comprehensive negative tests for the Noise handshake process.The
wrong_buffer_sizesfunction tests various error scenarios related to incorrect buffer sizes and payloads during the Noise handshake process. It covers the following scenarios:
- Initiating a connection with a buffer that is too small
- Initiating a connection with a payload that is too large
- Responding to a client with a buffer that is too small
- Responding to a client with a first message that is too large or too small
- Responding to a client with an incorrect prologue
- Responding to a client with a payload that is too large
- Finalizing a connection with a response that is too large or too small
- Exchanging messages with an incorrect authentication tag
The test uses both the
initiate_connection/finalize_connectionandparse_client_init_message/respond_to_clientAPIs, ensuring that both ways of performing the handshake are tested.Some observations and suggestions:
- The test covers a wide range of error scenarios related to incorrect buffer sizes and payloads, providing good test coverage for the error handling capabilities of the Noise implementation.
- The test could be improved by adding more specific assertions or error checks to ensure that the correct error types and messages are returned in each scenario.
- Consider adding tests for other types of errors, such as using incorrect keys, unsupported algorithms, or invalid state transitions, to further increase the test coverage.
- The test could be made more readable by extracting some of the repeated code into helper functions or using more descriptive variable names.
Overall, the
wrong_buffer_sizesfunction provides a comprehensive set of negative tests for the Noise handshake process, covering various error scenarios related to incorrect buffer sizes and payloads. The test ensures that the implementation handles these error cases gracefully and returns appropriate errors. The test could be further improved by adding more specific assertions and covering additional error scenarios to increase the robustness of the implementation.crates/aptos-crypto/benches/ark_bls12_381.rs (1)
1-649: LGTM!The code changes in this new file are approved. The file contains comprehensive benchmarking code for various operations in the
ark_bls12_381crate. The code is well-structured and follows best practices.crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/bls12381_test.rs (1)
1-448: LGTM!The code changes in this new file are approved. The file contains comprehensive unit tests for various functions in the
bls12381module. The tests cover key functionality like signature generation, verification, serialization, deserialization, and aggregation. The code is well-structured and follows best practices.crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/multi_ed25519_test.rs (1)
1-562: LGTM!The code changes in this new file are approved. The file contains comprehensive unit tests for various functions in the
multi_ed25519module. The tests cover key functionality like key generation, signature generation, verification, serialization, and deserialization. The code is well-structured and follows best practices.crates/aptos-crypto/src/hash.rs (1)
1-705: Code looks great, no issues found.The cryptographic hashing traits and implementations are well-designed and documented. The code is modular, secure, and makes good use of Rust features.
I didn't spot any correctness or security issues. The documentation does a good job explaining the motivation and usage.
Great job on this!
crates/aptos-crypto/src/noise.rs (4)
5-18: LGTM!The code comment provides a clear and informative overview of the Noise protocol implementation in this file.
80-122: LGTM!The constants defined in the file are appropriately named and have reasonable values for the Noise protocol implementation.
222-577: LGTM!The
NoiseConfigstruct and its associated functions provide a well-structured and clean API for performing Noise handshakes. The code is properly organized and follows best practices.
583-715: LGTM!The
NoiseSessionstruct and its associated functions are well-implemented and handle session management and message encryption/decryption correctly. The code follows best practices and is properly organized.crates/aptos-crypto-derive/src/unions.rs (8)
9-30: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
32-70: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
72-83: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
85-101: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
103-131: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
133-162: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
164-176: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
178-309: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
crates/aptos-crypto/src/test_utils.rs (10)
17-25: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
27-37: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
39-51: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
54-67: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
69-79: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
103-116: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
120-127: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
133-157: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
163-181: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
184-222: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
| if [ "$mean" = "null" ]; then | ||
| echo "No .slope.point_estimate, using .mean.point_estimate" 1>&2 | ||
|
|
||
| mean=`cat $critdir/$hash_func/$n/new/estimates.json | jq .mean.point_estimate` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix or remove the line referencing undefined variable hash_func.
Shellcheck warns that hash_func is referenced but not assigned. It seems to be an error.
Either define the variable hash_func or remove this line if it's not needed.
Tools
Shellcheck
[warning] 29-29: hash_func is referenced but not assigned.
(SC2154)
[warning] 29-29: n is referenced but not assigned.
(SC2154)
Fix or remove the line referencing undefined variable n.
Shellcheck warns that n is referenced but not assigned. It seems to be an error.
Either define the variable n or remove this line if it's not needed.
Tools
Shellcheck
[warning] 29-29: hash_func is referenced but not assigned.
(SC2154)
[warning] 29-29: n is referenced but not assigned.
(SC2154)
|
|
||
| set -e | ||
|
|
||
| scriptdir=$(cd $(dirname $0); pwd -P) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Quote the command substitution to prevent word splitting.
Shellcheck warns to quote this to prevent word splitting.
Apply this diff to fix the Shellcheck warning:
-scriptdir=$(cd $(dirname $0); pwd -P)
+scriptdir=$(cd "$(dirname "$0")"; pwd -P)Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| scriptdir=$(cd $(dirname $0); pwd -P) | |
| scriptdir=$(cd "$(dirname "$0")"; pwd -P) |
Tools
Shellcheck
[warning] 5-5: Quote this to prevent word splitting.
(SC2046)
|
|
||
| set -e | ||
|
|
||
| scriptdir=$(cd $(dirname $0); pwd -P) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Quote the command substitution to prevent word splitting.
The command substitution $(dirname $0) should be quoted to prevent word splitting and globbing.
-scriptdir=$(cd $(dirname $0); pwd -P)
+scriptdir=$(cd "$(dirname "$0")"; pwd -P)Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| scriptdir=$(cd $(dirname $0); pwd -P) | |
| scriptdir=$(cd "$(dirname "$0")"; pwd -P) |
Tools
Shellcheck
[warning] 5-5: Quote this to prevent word splitting.
(SC2046)
crypto/src/keygen.rs
Outdated
| pub fn generate_ed25519_keypair(&mut self) -> (Ed25519PrivateKey, Ed25519PublicKey) { | ||
| let private_key = self.generate_ed25519_private_key(); | ||
| let public_key = private_key.public_key(); | ||
| (private_key, public_key) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove the duplicate method.
The new generate_ed25519_keypair method is a duplicate of the existing generate_keypair method.
Remove the new method:
- /// Generate an Ed25519 key pair.
- pub fn generate_ed25519_keypair(&mut self) -> (Ed25519PrivateKey, Ed25519PublicKey) {
- let private_key = self.generate_ed25519_private_key();
- let public_key = private_key.public_key();
- (private_key, public_key)
- }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| pub fn generate_ed25519_keypair(&mut self) -> (Ed25519PrivateKey, Ed25519PublicKey) { | |
| let private_key = self.generate_ed25519_private_key(); | |
| let public_key = private_key.public_key(); | |
| (private_key, public_key) | |
| } |
| @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ | |||
| no_threads="--features=blst/no-threads" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add a shebang.
Shellcheck has flagged an error for missing shebang:
[error] 1-1: Tips depend on target shell and yours is unknown. Add a shebang or a 'shell' directive.
To fix this, add a shebang at the beginning of the script to specify the interpreter. For example:
#!/bin/bashTools
Shellcheck
[error] 1-1: Tips depend on target shell and yours is unknown. Add a shebang or a 'shell' directive.
(SC2148)
| # (Currently, just hashing) | ||
| # | ||
|
|
||
| [ ! -d $critdir/hash/ ] && { echo "No benchmark results for $hash_func. Be sure to run 'cargo bench -- hash' first..."; exit 1; } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix undefined variable reference.
Shellcheck reported the following warning for this line:
- SC2154:
hash_funcis referenced but not assigned.
The variable hash_func is not defined in the script. Either define it or remove the reference to fix the warning.
Tools
Shellcheck
[warning] 27-27: hash_func is referenced but not assigned.
(SC2154)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
crypto/src/lib.rs (1)
7-8: Remove or complete the comment.The comment seems to be incomplete and a typo. Please remove it or complete the sentence.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (4)
- Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- crypto/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- crypto/crypto-macro/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- crypto/src/lib.rs (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- crypto/crypto-macro/Cargo.toml
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- crypto/Cargo.toml
Additional comments not posted (5)
crypto/src/lib.rs (4)
13-14: LGTM!The changes in the
ed25519module are approved.
33-33: LGTM!The change in the
test_utilsmodule is approved.
37-37: LGTM!The change in the
traitsmodule is approved.
50-50: LGTM!The changes in the
derivemodule are approved.Cargo.toml (1)
2-97: Significant updates to the workspace configuration and dependencies. LGTM, but ensure thorough testing.The changes in
Cargo.tomlare substantial and include:
- A new resolver version, which can impact dependency resolution.
- New workspace members
aptos-cryptoandaptos-crypto-derive, expanding the project's scope.- A comprehensive list of new dependencies related to cryptography, suggesting significant enhancements in capabilities.
- A patch for the
x25519-dalekcrate, reflecting active dependency management.These changes are approved as they seem to align with the project's objectives.
However, given the scale of the updates, it is crucial to thoroughly test the software to ensure that:
- The new dependencies integrate correctly.
- There are no unintended side effects or performance regressions.
- The software functions as expected.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
Cargo.toml (1)
19-87: Approve addition of shared dependencies, but audit custom dependencies.Adding the
[workspace.dependencies]section to specify shared dependencies across the workspace is a good practice and is approved.However, some of the dependencies like
bcsandposeidon-arkare sourced from custom git repositories.Please audit these dependencies to ensure they are secure, reliable and actively maintained. Consider migrating to official crates.io releases if possible.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (3)
- Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- crypto/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- crates/aptos-crypto/Cargo.toml
- crypto/Cargo.toml
Additional comments not posted (4)
Cargo.toml (4)
6-7: LGTM!The code changes to add the new
aptos-cryptoandaptos-crypto-derivecrates to the workspace are approved.Also applies to: 13-14
96-96: LGTM!Setting
codegen-unitsto 1 for release builds is approved as it can improve runtime performance.
98-99: Justify the need for custom patch and ensure its reliability.The
x25519-dalekcrate is being patched to use a custom version from a git branch.Please verify that this patch is absolutely necessary and cannot be avoided by using an official release of the crate.
If the patch is necessary, ensure that the custom version is secure, reliable and actively maintained. Periodically check if the patch can be removed in favor of an official release.
To verify the patch, please provide answers to the following:
- Why is this patch necessary? What issues does it fix or what functionality does it add?
- Has the patched version been audited for security and reliability?
- Is the git branch being actively maintained?
- Is there a plan to eventually remove this patch and move to an official release?
2-2: Verify the impact of enabling the v2 resolver.The v2 resolver is currently unstable and may have compatibility issues with some dependencies.
Please ensure that all dependencies are compatible with the v2 resolver and that enabling it does not introduce any build failures or runtime issues.
Run the following script to verify the build with the v2 resolver:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
crypto/src/lib.rs (2)
44-46: Add unit tests for the newbls12381moduleThe
bls12381module has been added. Please ensure that unit tests are included to verify its functionality and integration.
48-50: Add unit tests for the newbulletproofsmoduleThe
bulletproofsmodule has been added. Please include unit tests to validate its functionality and ensure reliability.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- crypto/src/lib.rs (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
crypto/src/lib.rs (1)
62-62: Confirm the updated imports in thederivemoduleThe
derivemodule now imports fromaptos_crypto_derive. Ensure that all derived traits are functioning correctly with the updated dependencies.
crypto/src/lib.rs
Outdated
| // just wr | ||
| // ap diem-crypto and aptos-crypto |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Clarify or correct the incomplete comments
The comments on lines 7-8 appear to be incomplete or contain typos:
// just wr
// ap diem-crypto and aptos-crypto
Please revise these comments to clearly convey their intended meaning for better code readability.
crypto/src/lib.rs
Outdated
| pub use aptos_crypto::ed25519::{ | ||
| Ed25519PrivateKey, Ed25519PublicKey, Ed25519Signature, | ||
| ED25519_PRIVATE_KEY_LENGTH, ED25519_PUBLIC_KEY_LENGTH, | ||
| ED25519_SIGNATURE_LENGTH, | ||
| }; | ||
| use aptos_crypto::PrivateKey; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Incomplete migration from diem_crypto to aptos_crypto detected
Remaining references to diem_crypto found in the following files:
crates/diem-crypto-derive/src/unions.rscrates/diem-crypto-derive/src/lib.rscrates/diem-crypto/src/hkdf.rscrates/diem-crypto/src/noise.rscrates/diem-crypto/src/unit_tests/ed25519_test.rscrates/diem-crypto/src/unit_tests/cross_test.rscrates/diem-crypto/src/x25519.rscrates/diem-crypto/src/multi_ed25519.rscrates/diem-crypto/src/ed25519.rscrates/diem-crypto/src/unit_tests/cryptohasher.rscrates/diem-crypto/benches/noise.rscrates/diem-crypto/src/unit_tests/compilation/cross_test_trait_obj_pub.rscrates/diem-crypto/src/unit_tests/compilation/small_kdf.rscrates/diem-crypto/src/unit_tests/compilation/cross_test_trait_obj_sig.rscrates/diem-crypto/benches/ed25519.rscrates/diem-crypto/src/unit_tests/compilation/cross_test_trait_obj.rscrates/diem-crypto/src/unit_tests/compilation/cross_test.rscrypto/src/hash.rs
Please address these remaining references to ensure complete migration.
Analysis chain
Verify complete migration from diem_crypto to aptos_crypto
The ed25519 module has been updated to use aptos_crypto. Please ensure that all occurrences of diem_crypto in the codebase have been replaced with aptos_crypto to maintain consistency.
Run the following script to identify any remaining references to diem_crypto:
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any remaining references to `diem_crypto`.
rg 'diem_crypto'
Length of output: 7140
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
Cargo.toml (1)
13-79: Comprehensive dependency list added, but consider maintenance implications.The addition of numerous dependencies expands the project's capabilities. However, this approach has some considerations:
- Using specific Git revisions for some dependencies (e.g.,
bcs,openrpc-schema,poseidon-ark) ensures reproducibility but may lead to outdated packages if not regularly updated.- The large number of dependencies might increase compilation time and complexity.
Consider the following suggestions:
- Implement a regular review process for updating Git-sourced dependencies to their latest stable versions.
- Evaluate if all these dependencies are necessary or if some functionality can be consolidated to reduce the dependency count.
- Consider using a dependency management tool like
cargo-udepsto identify and remove unused dependencies.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- Cargo.toml (2 hunks)
- crypto/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- crypto/src/lib.rs (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- crypto/src/lib.rs
🔇 Additional comments (6)
crypto/Cargo.toml (2)
Line range hint
1-25: Request for additional context and comprehensive testing.The changes in this PR represent a significant shift in the project's dependencies and cryptographic foundation. Switching from Diem to Aptos crypto libraries and reorganizing the project structure with workspace references are substantial modifications that could impact the entire project.
Given the importance of these changes:
Could you provide more context on the motivation behind this transition? Understanding the reasons for these changes would help in evaluating their appropriateness and potential benefits.
Have comprehensive tests been conducted to ensure that all functionality remains intact after these changes? This should include unit tests, integration tests, and any specific cryptographic tests that may be affected by the switch to Aptos crypto.
Are there any known breaking changes or areas that require special attention during the transition?
Has there been any performance benchmarking to compare the Diem and Aptos crypto implementations?
To get an overview of the project's test coverage and any potential issues, please run the following:
#!/bin/bash # Check for test files and their contents fd -e rs -x rg --type rust 'mod tests' {} # Look for any TODO or FIXME comments that might indicate incomplete transitions rg --type rust 'TODO|FIXME' # Check for any remaining references to Diem in the Rust files rg --type rust 'diem'Consider creating or updating project documentation to reflect these significant changes. This should include:
- The rationale behind the switch to Aptos crypto
- Any changes in the security model or guarantees
- Updated usage instructions if the API has changed
- Migration guide for any breaking changes
This documentation will be crucial for maintaining the project and onboarding new contributors.
25-25: Verify fuzzing functionality with new dependency.The
fuzzingfeature has been updated to useaptos-crypto/fuzzinginstead ofdiem-crypto/fuzzing. This change is consistent with the switch to Aptos crypto libraries.To ensure that the fuzzing functionality remains intact, please run the following verification:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any fuzzing-related tests or configurations rg --type rust 'fuzz|fuzzing|proptest' # Look for any fuzzing-related documentation fd -e md -x rg 'fuzz|fuzzing|proptest' {}If you need assistance in updating or creating new fuzzing tests to accommodate the switch to Aptos crypto, please let me know, and I can help generate the necessary code or open a GitHub issue to track this task.
Cargo.toml (4)
Line range hint
82-88: Release profile optimizations look good.The changes to the release profile, including disabling debug information, setting panic to "unwind", disabling debug assertions, and setting codegen-units to 1, are good optimizations for release builds. These settings should help improve performance and reduce binary size.
90-91: Monitor the necessity of the x25519-dalek patch.The addition of a patch for x25519-dalek to use a specific Git branch is noted. While this may be necessary for accessing unreleased features or fixes, it's important to:
- Regularly check if the patch is still required or if the main crate has been updated to include the needed changes.
- Be aware of potential incompatibilities that may arise from using a patched version.
Please run the following script to check if there's a newer version of x25519-dalek that might eliminate the need for this patch:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for newer versions of x25519-dalek # Test: Compare the latest crates.io version with the one specified in Cargo.toml latest_version=$(cargo search x25519-dalek | grep -oP '(?<=").*(?=")' | head -n 1) specified_version=$(grep 'x25519-dalek = ' Cargo.toml | grep -oP '(?<=").*(?=")') echo "Latest version: $latest_version" echo "Specified version: $specified_version"
Line range hint
1-91: Comprehensive update requires thorough testing and gradual rollout.The changes to Cargo.toml reflect a significant update to the project's dependencies and configuration, including a shift towards the Aptos ecosystem. While the individual changes are generally positive, the scale of the modifications introduces potential risks:
- Compatibility issues with existing code due to numerous dependency updates.
- Performance impacts from the addition of many new dependencies.
- Potential build or runtime issues due to the workspace configuration changes.
To mitigate these risks:
- Implement comprehensive integration tests to ensure all components work correctly with the new dependencies.
- Consider a gradual rollout of these changes, possibly using feature flags to enable new functionality incrementally.
- Monitor build times and runtime performance closely after these changes.
- Update project documentation to reflect any new capabilities or changed behaviors resulting from these updates.
Run the following script to perform a basic verification of the project's integrity after these changes:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify project integrity after Cargo.toml changes # Test: Attempt to build and test the entire project echo "Building project..." cargo build --all-targets echo "Running tests..." cargo test --all-targets echo "Checking for warnings or errors..." cargo check --all-targets
2-11: Workspace configuration changes look good, but verify build process.The update to resolver "2" and the changes in the members list are positive improvements. However, the simplification of default members might impact the build process.
Please run the following script to verify that the build process still works as expected:
| serde = { workspace = true } | ||
| serde_bytes = { workspace = true } | ||
| hex = { workspace = true } | ||
| anyhow = { workspace = true } | ||
| aptos-crypto = { workspace = true, features = ["fuzzing"] } | ||
| aptos-crypto-derive = { workspace = true } | ||
| bcs = { workspace = true } | ||
| rand = { workspace = true } | ||
| rand_core = { workspace = true } | ||
| once_cell = { workspace = true } | ||
| serde-name = { workspace = true } | ||
| starcoin-crypto-macro = { workspace = true } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Residual references to diem-crypto found in the codebase.
Several instances of diem-crypto are still present in the codebase, indicating that the migration to aptos-crypto may be incomplete. This could lead to dependency inconsistencies and potential build issues.
- References found in:
crypto/src/hash.rs- Multiple files under
crates/diem-crypto/
🔗 Analysis chain
Significant changes in dependencies and project structure.
The dependencies have been updated to use workspace references, which is a good practice for maintaining consistency across the project. However, there are some important changes to note:
-
The switch from
diem-cryptoanddiem-crypto-derivetoaptos-cryptoandaptos-crypto-deriverepresents a significant change in the underlying cryptographic implementation. This change may have far-reaching effects on the project's functionality and security. -
The adoption of workspace references for all dependencies suggests a reorganization of the project structure. This change can improve maintainability but may require updates in other parts of the project.
To ensure that these changes are consistent throughout the project, please run the following script:
Consider documenting the rationale behind switching from Diem to Aptos crypto libraries, including any potential impacts on the project's security model or performance. This information will be valuable for future maintenance and audits.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any remaining references to diem-crypto
rg --type toml 'diem-crypto'
# Verify that all Cargo.toml files in the project use workspace references
fd -e toml -x rg --type toml -v 'workspace = true' {}
Length of output: 9405
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 40
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (21)
crates/aptos-crypto/src/encoding_type.rs (2)
101-102: Simplify Conversion ofpathtoStringYou can simplify
format!("{}", path.display())topath.display().to_string(), which is more idiomatic and avoids an extra formatting step.Apply this diff to simplify the code:
fn read_from_file(path: &Path) -> Result<Vec<u8>, EncodingError> { std::fs::read(path) - .map_err(|e| EncodingError::UnableToReadFile(format!("{}", path.display()), e.to_string())) + .map_err(|e| EncodingError::UnableToReadFile(path.display().to_string(), e.to_string())) }
52-97: Add Unit Tests for Encoding and Decoding MethodsTo ensure the reliability of the
encode_key,load_key, anddecode_keymethods across different encoding types, please add comprehensive unit tests. This will help validate the correctness of key serialization and deserialization, and catch any potential issues early.Would you like assistance in creating unit tests for these methods or opening a GitHub issue to track this task?
crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/bcs_test.rs (7)
14-14: Unnecessary import ofstd::convert::TryFromThe
TryFromtrait has been part of the prelude since Rust 1.34 and the 2018 edition. Explicitly importing it is unnecessary and can be removed for cleaner code.Apply this change to remove the unnecessary import:
-use std::convert::TryFrom;
18-18: Simplify serialization by removingCow::BorrowedThe usage of
Cow::Borrowedis unnecessary when serializing references usingbcs::to_bytes. You can directly pass a reference to the data, which simplifies the code and reduces overhead.Apply these changes to simplify the serialization calls:
-use std::borrow::Cow;Update the serialization statements:
- let serialized_public_key = bcs::to_bytes(&Cow::Borrowed(&public_key)).unwrap(); + let serialized_public_key = bcs::to_bytes(&public_key).unwrap(); - let serialized_signature = bcs::to_bytes(&Cow::Borrowed(&signature)).unwrap(); + let serialized_signature = bcs::to_bytes(&signature).unwrap();
24-25: Simplify serialization by removingCow::BorrowedAs mentioned earlier, you can remove
Cow::Borrowedin these serialization calls for consistency and simplicity.Apply these changes:
- let serialized_public_key = bcs::to_bytes(&Cow::Borrowed(&public_key)).unwrap(); + let serialized_public_key = bcs::to_bytes(&public_key).unwrap(); - let serialized_signature = bcs::to_bytes(&Cow::Borrowed(&signature)).unwrap(); + let serialized_signature = bcs::to_bytes(&signature).unwrap();Also applies to: 36-37
68-69: Simplify serialization by removingCow::BorrowedContinue simplifying serialization in the multi-signature tests by removing
Cow::Borrowed.Apply these changes:
- let serialized_multi_public_key = bcs::to_bytes(&Cow::Borrowed(&multi_public_key_7of10)).unwrap(); + let serialized_multi_public_key = bcs::to_bytes(&multi_public_key_7of10).unwrap(); - let serialized_multi_signature = bcs::to_bytes(&Cow::Borrowed(&multi_signature_7of10)).unwrap(); + let serialized_multi_signature = bcs::to_bytes(&multi_signature_7of10).unwrap();Also applies to: 89-90
70-73: Typographical error: 'specialization' should be 'serialization'In the comments explaining the expected sizes, the term 'specialization' seems to be a typo. It should be 'serialization' to accurately reflect the context.
Apply this change to correct the comments:
- // Expected size due to specialization is + // Expected size due to serialization isAlso applies to: 90-93
54-59: Consider moving the helper functiongenerate_keysoutside the test functionDefining
generate_keyswithin the test function reduces readability and reusability. Moving it to the module level enhances clarity and allows for potential reuse in other tests.Move the
generate_keysfunction outside themulti_ed25519_bcs_materialtest function:// Place this at the module level, outside of any function fn generate_keys(n: usize) -> Vec<Ed25519PrivateKey> { let mut rng = StdRng::from_seed(TEST_SEED); (0..n) .map(|_| Ed25519PrivateKey::generate(&mut rng)) .collect() }Then update the test function accordingly:
- // Helper function to generate N ed25519 private keys. - fn generate_keys(n: usize) -> Vec<Ed25519PrivateKey> { ... }
101-104: Clarify the expected bitmap in multi-signature verificationThe hardcoded bitmap value could be explained or computed programmatically to enhance clarity. This helps future maintainers understand why this specific bitmap is expected.
Consider computing the bitmap dynamically based on the keys used:
let expected_bitmap = multi_signature_7of10.bitmap(); assert_eq!(expected_bitmap, &[0b1111_1110, 0u8, 0u8, 0u8]);Or add a comment explaining the bitmap representation.
crates/aptos-crypto/src/secp256r1_ecdsa/secp256r1_ecdsa_sigs.rs (3)
134-140: Provide more context in error messagesIn
verify_arbitrary_msg, the error returned bypublic_key.0.verifyis converted to a generic error message. This may obscure the underlying cause of the failure.Consider preserving the original error message for better debugging:
- .map_err(|e| anyhow!("{}", e)) + .map_err(|e| anyhow!("Verification failed: {}", e))
160-165: OptimizePartialEqimplementationThe current implementation of
PartialEqcompares the byte representations of the signatures. Sincep256::ecdsa::Signaturealready implementsPartialEq, you can leverage it for a more efficient comparison.Simplify the
eqmethod:- fn eq(&self, other: &Signature) -> bool { - self.to_bytes()[..] == other.to_bytes()[..] - } + fn eq(&self, other: &Signature) -> bool { + self.0 == other.0 + }
187-188: Ensure consistent signature display formatThe
fmt::Displayimplementation outputs the signature in hexadecimal format. Consistency in signature representation across the codebase is important for readability and debugging.If a different format (e.g., base64) is standard in other parts of the codebase, consider updating the implementation:
- write!(f, "{}", hex::encode(&self.0.to_bytes()[..])) + write!(f, "{}", base64::encode(&self.0.to_bytes()[..]))Ensure that the chosen format aligns with the project's conventions.
crates/aptos-crypto/src/ed25519/ed25519_sigs.rs (3)
25-28: Enhance documentation for theto_bytesmethodWhile the
to_bytesmethod is self-explanatory, adding more detailed documentation can improve readability and assist future developers in understanding its purpose and usage.
157-167: Clarify comments inTryFrom<&[u8]> for Ed25519SignatureimplementationThe comment mentions duplicate checks for mauled signatures. Rephrasing the comment can clarify why this check is necessary here, even though it's performed elsewhere.
178-188: Add documentation toDisplayandDebugimplementationsProviding documentation comments for the
DisplayandDebugtrait implementations can enhance code understanding and maintainability.crates/aptos-crypto/src/test_utils.rs (4)
15-16: Consider DerivingCloneandDebugUnconditionallyThe
#[cfg_attr(feature = "cloneable-private-keys", derive(Clone))]attribute conditionally derivesCloneforKeyPair, based on thecloneable-private-keysfeature. Since this module is primarily for testing and utilities, it might be beneficial to deriveCloneandDebugunconditionally to simplify testing and debugging.
184-196: Remove Unnecessarymutand Sorting inrandom_subsetFunctionThe
mutkeyword onrngis redundant since it's already a mutable reference. Additionally, if the order of elements doesn't matter, sorting the vector after selection may be unnecessary.Apply this diff to streamline the function:
-pub fn random_subset<R>(mut rng: &mut R, max_set_size: usize, subset_size: usize) -> Vec<usize> +pub fn random_subset<R>(rng: &mut R, max_set_size: usize, subset_size: usize) -> Vec<usize> where R: ::rand::Rng + ?Sized, { let vec = (0..max_set_size) - .choose_multiple(&mut rng, subset_size) + .choose_multiple(rng, subset_size) .collect::<Vec<usize>>(); - - vec.sort_unstable(); vec }
203-205: Simplify Random Byte GenerationThe
random_bytesfunction can be simplified by using theStandarddistribution, which generates randomu8values over the entire range.Apply this diff to simplify the function:
pub fn random_bytes<R>(rng: &mut R, n: usize) -> Vec<u8> where R: ::rand::Rng + Copy, { - let range = distributions::Uniform::from(0u8..u8::MAX); - rng.sample_iter(&range).take(n).collect() + rng.sample_iter(distributions::Standard).take(n).collect() }
312-313: Review the Use of.no_shrink()in Proptest StrategyThe
random_serializable_structfunction uses.no_shrink(), which disables shrinking in property-based tests. Unless there is a specific reason to avoid shrinking (e.g., shrinking causes invalid data), allowing shrinking can help identify minimal failing cases.If shrinking is acceptable, consider removing
.no_shrink():pub fn random_serializable_struct() -> impl Strategy<Value = TestAptosCrypto> { - (String::arbitrary()).prop_map(TestAptosCrypto).no_shrink() + (String::arbitrary()).prop_map(TestAptosCrypto) }crates/aptos-crypto/src/hash.rs (2)
40-50: Update documentation comments to reflect the correct crate names.In the code examples within the documentation comments, the crate names reference
aptos_cryptoandaptos_crypto_derive. If this code is intended for the Starcoin project, please update these references to point to the appropriate crates to maintain consistency and avoid confusion.For example, update:
use aptos_crypto::hash::CryptoHash; use aptos_crypto_derive::{CryptoHasher, BCSCryptoHash};to:
use starcoin_crypto::hash::CryptoHash; use starcoin_crypto_derive::{CryptoHasher, BCSCryptoHash};
66-70: Correct crate references in documentation.Similarly, in this section, update the crate references to match the Starcoin project:
use aptos_crypto_derive::CryptoHasher;should be:
use starcoin_crypto_derive::CryptoHasher;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
- crates/aptos-crypto-derive/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto-derive/src/unions.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/ed25519/ed25519_keys.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/ed25519/ed25519_sigs.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/encoding_type.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/hash.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/multi_ed25519.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/secp256r1_ecdsa/secp256r1_ecdsa_sigs.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/test_utils.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/bcs_test.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/multi_ed25519_test.rs (1 hunks)
- crypto/src/hash.rs (1 hunks)
- crypto/src/keygen.rs (3 hunks)
- crypto/src/multi_ed25519/multi_shard.rs (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Gitleaks
crates/aptos-crypto/src/ed25519/ed25519_keys.rs
246-246: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
269-269: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
crates/aptos-crypto/src/ed25519/ed25519_sigs.rs
93-93: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
🔇 Additional comments (20)
crypto/src/hash.rs (2)
Line range hint
1-43: Summary of changes and next stepsThe changes in this file primarily involve updating import statements and introducing new elements (
DummyHasherandstarcoin_crypto_macro). While these modifications align with the transition fromdiem_cryptotoaptos_crypto, there are a few points that require attention:
- Ensure that the transition to
aptos_cryptois consistent across the entire codebase.- Clarify the purpose and usage of
DummyHasher.- Explain the rationale behind introducing
starcoin_crypto_macroand its implications on existing code.- Verify that all implementations of
CryptoHashandCryptoHasherare compatible with the new macro-based approach.Addressing these points will help ensure a smooth transition and maintain the integrity of the cryptographic implementations.
8-8: Introduction of starcoin_crypto_macroThe addition of
starcoin_crypto_macroforCryptoHashandCryptoHasheris noted.To better understand this change:
- Could you explain the rationale behind introducing this macro? What benefits does it bring over the previous implementation?
- Are there any changes required in how
CryptoHashandCryptoHasherare used throughout the codebase due to this macro introduction?Please run the following script to check the usage of these traits:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check usage of CryptoHash and CryptoHasher traits echo "Files using CryptoHash trait:" rg --type rust "impl.*CryptoHash" echo "\nFiles using CryptoHasher trait:" rg --type rust "impl.*CryptoHasher"This will help ensure that all implementations are consistent with the new macro-based approach.
crypto/src/keygen.rs (5)
4-5: LGTM: Updated import statementThe change from the previous crypto crate to
aptos_cryptofor thebls12381import is correct and aligns with the project's transition to the Aptos cryptographic library.
32-34: LGTM: New method for Ed25519 private key generationThe addition of
generate_ed25519_private_keymethod is a good improvement. It encapsulates the private key generation logic, enhancing code modularity and reusability.
38-41: LGTM: Updatedgenerate_keypairmethodThe modification to use the new
generate_ed25519_private_keymethod ingenerate_keypairis a good refactoring. It improves code consistency and reduces duplication while maintaining the same functionality.
43-46: LGTM: New method for BLS12381 private key generationThe addition of
generate_bls12381_private_keymethod is a valuable extension to theKeyGenstruct. It provides support for BLS12381 key generation, following a consistent pattern with the existing Ed25519 key generation methods.
48-52:⚠️ Potential issueRemove the duplicate method
generate_ed25519_keypairThe newly added
generate_ed25519_keypairmethod is functionally identical to the existinggenerate_keypairmethod. Having duplicate methods can lead to confusion and maintenance issues.As suggested in a previous review, please remove this duplicate method:
- /// Generate an Ed25519 key pair. - pub fn generate_ed25519_keypair(&mut self) -> (Ed25519PrivateKey, Ed25519PublicKey) { - let private_key = self.generate_ed25519_private_key(); - let public_key = private_key.public_key(); - (private_key, public_key) - }If the intention is to have a method specifically named for Ed25519, consider renaming the existing
generate_keypairmethod togenerate_ed25519_keypairinstead of having two identical methods.crates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/bcs_test.rs (2)
16-47: Test functioned25519_bcs_materiallooks goodThe test accurately checks the BCS serialization and deserialization of
Ed25519PublicKeyandEd25519Signature. The assertions verify the correctness of the serialization process and signature verification.
49-110: Test functionmulti_ed25519_bcs_materiallooks goodThe test effectively validates the BCS serialization and deserialization of
MultiEd25519PublicKeyandMultiEd25519Signature. It also correctly checks the signature verification process for multi-signatures with the specified threshold.crates/aptos-crypto/src/secp256r1_ecdsa/secp256r1_ecdsa_sigs.rs (1)
123-125: Verify hashing algorithm consistencyIn the
verifymethod, the message is passed throughsigning_message(message)?. It's crucial to ensure that this hashing aligns with the ECDSA specification over Secp256r1 to prevent verification issues.Please confirm that
signing_messageapplies the correct hashing algorithm (SHA-256) consistent with Secp256r1 ECDSA standards.crates/aptos-crypto/src/ed25519/ed25519_sigs.rs (4)
17-19: Well-structured definition ofEd25519SignatureThe
Ed25519Signaturestruct is properly defined with serialization and deserialization traits, ensuring efficient handling of signatures.
170-174: Effective implementation ofPartialEqforEd25519SignatureThe
PartialEqtrait is correctly implemented by comparing the byte representations, ensuring accurate equality checks.
150-155: Consistency betweenHashandPartialEqimplementationsUsing
to_bytesin bothhashandeqmethods guarantees that equivalent signatures produce the same hash value, which is crucial for hash-based collections.
41-45: Ensuredummy_signatureis used appropriatelyThe
dummy_signaturefunction is intended for testing and fuzzing. Verify that it is not inadvertently included in production builds to prevent misuse.crates/aptos-crypto/src/ed25519/ed25519_keys.rs (2)
51-58:⚠️ Potential issuePotential Risks with
from_bytes_uncheckedinEd25519PrivateKeyThe method
from_bytes_uncheckeddeserializes anEd25519PrivateKeywithout any validation checks apart from expected key size (lines 51-58). This could introduce security risks if invalid or malicious key material is deserialized.Recommend adding validation to ensure the private key is valid and not in a small subgroup, or clearly documenting the security considerations of using this method.
95-102:⚠️ Potential issuePotential Risks with
from_bytes_uncheckedinEd25519PublicKeySimilarly, the method
from_bytes_uncheckedinEd25519PublicKey(lines 95-102) does not check the public key for membership in the prime-order subgroup. This could pose security risks in certain scenarios.Consider adding validation to ensure the public key resides in the correct subgroup, or clearly document the security implications of using this method without checks.
crates/aptos-crypto-derive/src/lib.rs (2)
114-129: Ensure consistent handling of generics insilent_displayThe
SilentDisplaymacro does not handle where clauses. Verify that the generics and where clauses are correctly propagated.Inspect the implementation to ensure that any generic parameters and where clauses are properly applied in the generated code.
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for proper handling of generics and where clauses in macros. # Test: Search for occurrences where generics are split but not used correctly. # Expected: The generics and where clauses should be included in the impl blocks. rg 'let \(impl_generics, ty_generics, where_clause\) = .*\n.*impl #impl_generics .*\n' crates/aptos-crypto-derive/src/lib.rs
362-366: Consider avoidingformat!inIdent::newUsing
format!withinIdent::newcan introduce unexpected characters. Ensure that identifiers are valid Rust identifiers.Check if
hasher_nameandstatic_seed_namefollow Rust's identifier rules. If they contain invalid characters, this could lead to compilation errors.✅ Verification successful
Identifiers
hasher_nameandstatic_seed_namefollow Rust's identifier rules.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that generated identifiers are valid Rust identifiers. # Test: Search for non-alphanumeric characters in identifier names. # Expected: No matches should be found. rg 'Ident::new\(\s*&format!\(".*"\),\s*Span::call_site\(\)\s*\)' -A 2 crates/aptos-crypto-derive/src/lib.rs | grep -E '[^a-zA-Z0-9_]'Length of output: 318
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that generated identifiers are valid Rust identifiers with multiline support. # Test: Search for non-alphanumeric characters in identifier names. # Expected: No matches should be found. rg -U 'Ident::new\(\s*&format!\(".*"\),\s*Span::call_site\(\)\s*\)' -A 2 crates/aptos-crypto-derive/src/lib.rs | grep -E '[^a-zA-Z0-9_]'Length of output: 138
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Use ast-grep to extract identifiers generated with format! and verify they contain only valid characters. # Step 1: Extract the formatted strings passed to Ident::new using ast-grep. ast-grep --lang rust --pattern 'Ident::new(format!("$_"), Span::call_site())' crates/aptos-crypto-derive/src/lib.rs > extracted_identifiers.txt # Step 2: Extract the string literals from the matched patterns. grep -oP 'format!\("([^"]+)"' extracted_identifiers.txt | sed 's/format!(\"\([^"]*\)\").*/\1/' > identifier_strings.txt # Step 3: Check for any non-alphanumeric characters in the extracted identifier strings. grep -E '[^a-zA-Z0-9_]' identifier_strings.txtLength of output: 263
crates/aptos-crypto/src/hash.rs (2)
531-569: Ensure proper use of cryptographic hash functions and seeds.The
DefaultHasherstruct and associated methods handle cryptographic hashing with seeds for domain separation. Please ensure that the seeds (HASH_PREFIXand type names) are correctly set for the Starcoin project to avoid hash collisions or security vulnerabilities.Consider reviewing the
prefixed_hashmethod and its usage to confirm it aligns with the project's cryptographic standards.
683-707: Verify hardcoded hash values for placeholders and genesis block IDs.The code includes hardcoded hash values for
ACCUMULATOR_PLACEHOLDER_HASH,SPARSE_MERKLE_PLACEHOLDER_HASH,PRE_GENESIS_BLOCK_ID, andGENESIS_BLOCK_ID. Ensure that these values are correct and align with the Starcoin project's specifications. Incorrect values could lead to consensus issues or other critical errors.You can run the following script to check for consistency of these hash values across the codebase:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that hardcoded hash values match the expected values. # Expected hash values (replace with the correct values if different). EXPECTED_ACCUMULATOR_HASH="ACCUMULATOR_PLACEHOLDER_HASH" EXPECTED_SPARSE_MERKLE_HASH="SPARSE_MERKLE_PLACEHOLDER_HASH" EXPECTED_PRE_GENESIS_BLOCK_ID="PRE_GENESIS_BLOCK_ID" EXPECTED_GENESIS_BLOCK_ID="GENESIS_BLOCK_ID" # Function to search for a hash value definition. function check_hash_value() { local name=$1 local expected_value=$2 rg --type rust "pub static $name" -A 5 | rg "$expected_value" } # Check each hash value. check_hash_value "ACCUMULATOR_PLACEHOLDER_HASH" "$EXPECTED_ACCUMULATOR_HASH" check_hash_value "SPARSE_MERKLE_PLACEHOLDER_HASH" "$EXPECTED_SPARSE_MERKLE_HASH" check_hash_value "PRE_GENESIS_BLOCK_ID" "$EXPECTED_PRE_GENESIS_BLOCK_ID" check_hash_value "GENESIS_BLOCK_ID" "$EXPECTED_GENESIS_BLOCK_ID"
| pub use aptos_crypto::hash::{ | ||
| CryptoHash, CryptoHasher, DefaultHasher, DummyHasher, HashValue, TestOnlyHash, | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Incomplete Transition from diem_crypto to aptos_crypto
The migration from diem_crypto to aptos_crypto is not fully complete. The following files still reference diem_crypto and require updates:
crypto/src/hash.rscrates/diem-crypto-derive/src/lib.rscrates/diem-crypto/src/ed25519.rscrates/diem-crypto/src/x25519.rscrates/diem-crypto/src/noise.rscrates/diem-crypto/src/multi_ed25519.rscrates/diem-crypto/src/hkdf.rscrates/diem-crypto/src/unit_tests/cryptohasher.rscrates/diem-crypto/src/unit_tests/cross_test.rscrates/diem-crypto/src/unit_tests/ed25519_test.rscrates/diem-crypto/src/bls12381/mod.rs- ...and others as listed in the shell script output.
Please ensure all instances of diem_crypto are replaced with aptos_crypto to maintain consistency and prevent potential conflicts.
🔗 Analysis chain
Transition to aptos_crypto and addition of DummyHasher
The change from diem_crypto to aptos_crypto looks good and aligns with the overall transition mentioned in the PR summary. The addition of DummyHasher to the imports is noted.
To ensure the transition is complete and consistent:
- Please verify that all other occurrences of
diem_cryptohave been updated toaptos_cryptothroughout the codebase. - Could you clarify the intended use of
DummyHasher? Is it for testing purposes or does it serve a specific role in the new implementation?
[/run_scripts]
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining instances of diem_crypto and list files using aptos_crypto
echo "Checking for remaining instances of diem_crypto:"
rg --type rust "diem_crypto"
echo "\nListing files using aptos_crypto:"
rg --type rust --files-with-matches "aptos_crypto"
Length of output: 4571
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Re-verify the absence of diem_crypto and ensure aptos_crypto is used consistently
echo "Checking for remaining instances of diem_crypto:"
rg --type rust "diem_crypto"
echo "\nListing all files using aptos_crypto:"
rg --type rust --files-with-matches "aptos_crypto"
Length of output: 9202
| #[default] | ||
| Hex, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure Compatibility of #[default] Attribute with Rust Version
The use of the #[default] attribute on the Hex variant requires Rust 1.62 or later. Please confirm that the project's minimum supported Rust version is updated accordingly, or consider implementing the Default trait manually to maintain compatibility with older Rust versions.
| match s.to_lowercase().as_str() { | ||
| "hex" => Ok(EncodingType::Hex), | ||
| "bcs" => Ok(EncodingType::BCS), | ||
| "base64" => Ok(EncodingType::Base64), | ||
| _ => Err("Invalid encoding type"), | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize from_str Method by Avoiding Unnecessary Allocation
Using s.eq_ignore_ascii_case() allows for case-insensitive comparison without allocating a new String, improving performance.
Apply this diff to optimize the code:
fn from_str(s: &str) -> Result<Self, Self::Err> {
- match s.to_lowercase().as_str() {
- "hex" => Ok(EncodingType::Hex),
- "bcs" => Ok(EncodingType::BCS),
- "base64" => Ok(EncodingType::Base64),
- _ => Err("Invalid encoding type"),
- }
+ if s.eq_ignore_ascii_case("hex") {
+ Ok(EncodingType::Hex)
+ } else if s.eq_ignore_ascii_case("bcs") {
+ Ok(EncodingType::BCS)
+ } else if s.eq_ignore_ascii_case("base64") {
+ Ok(EncodingType::Base64)
+ } else {
+ Err("Invalid encoding type")
+ }
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| match s.to_lowercase().as_str() { | |
| "hex" => Ok(EncodingType::Hex), | |
| "bcs" => Ok(EncodingType::BCS), | |
| "base64" => Ok(EncodingType::Base64), | |
| _ => Err("Invalid encoding type"), | |
| } | |
| if s.eq_ignore_ascii_case("hex") { | |
| Ok(EncodingType::Hex) | |
| } else if s.eq_ignore_ascii_case("bcs") { | |
| Ok(EncodingType::BCS) | |
| } else if s.eq_ignore_ascii_case("base64") { | |
| Ok(EncodingType::Base64) | |
| } else { | |
| Err("Invalid encoding type") | |
| } |
| fn check_s_lt_order_half(s: &[u8]) -> bool { | ||
| for i in 0..32 { | ||
| match s[i].cmp(&ORDER_HALF[i]) { | ||
| Ordering::Less => return true, | ||
| Ordering::Greater => return false, | ||
| _ => {} | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| // At this stage S == ORDER_HALF which implies a non canonical S. | ||
| false | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Implement constant-time comparison in check_s_lt_order_half
The check_s_lt_order_half function performs a byte-by-byte comparison which may expose the code to timing attacks, potentially revealing sensitive information.
[security]
Consider using a constant-time comparison function to prevent timing side-channel vulnerabilities. For example:
use subtle::ConstantTimeLess;
fn check_s_lt_order_half(s: &[u8]) -> bool {
s.ct_lt(&ORDER_HALF).unwrap_u8() == 1
}This requires adding the subtle crate to handle constant-time operations.
| if Signature::check_s_malleability(&self.to_bytes()[..]).is_ok() { | ||
| return self.clone(); | ||
| }; | ||
| let s = self.0.s(); | ||
| let r = self.0.r(); | ||
| let new_s = -*s; | ||
| let new_s_nonzero = NonZeroScalar::new(new_s).unwrap(); | ||
| let new_sig = p256::ecdsa::Signature::from_scalars(r, new_s_nonzero).unwrap(); | ||
| Signature(new_sig) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Adjust return type to handle potential errors
In the make_canonical method, the use of unwrap() can cause panics. To make the function safer, handle potential errors and adjust the return type accordingly.
Modify the method to return a Result<Signature, CryptoMaterialError>:
- pub fn make_canonical(&self) -> Signature {
+ pub fn make_canonical(&self) -> Result<Signature, CryptoMaterialError> {Handle the errors within the method:
if Signature::check_s_malleability(&self.to_bytes()[..]).is_ok() {
return Ok(self.clone());
}
let s = self.0.s();
let r = self.0.r();
let new_s = -*s;
let new_s_nonzero = NonZeroScalar::new(new_s)
.ok_or(CryptoMaterialError::CanonicalRepresentationError)?;
let new_sig = p256::ecdsa::Signature::from_scalars(r, new_s_nonzero)
.map_err(|_| CryptoMaterialError::CanonicalRepresentationError)?;
Ok(Signature(new_sig))| fn bitmap_set_bit(input: &mut [u8; BITMAP_NUM_OF_BYTES], index: usize) { | ||
| let bucket = index / 8; | ||
| // It's always invoked with index < 32, thus there is no need to check range. | ||
| let bucket_pos = index - (bucket * 8); | ||
| input[bucket] |= 128 >> bucket_pos as u8; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add index range checks in bitmap_set_bit
The bitmap_set_bit function assumes that index < 32 without explicitly checking it. If index is out of bounds, this could lead to a panic or undefined behavior. Consider adding a check to ensure the index is within the valid range.
Apply this diff to add the index range check:
fn bitmap_set_bit(input: &mut [u8; BITMAP_NUM_OF_BYTES], index: usize) {
+ if index >= 8 * BITMAP_NUM_OF_BYTES {
+ panic!("Index out of bounds in bitmap_set_bit");
+ }
let bucket = index / 8;
let bucket_pos = index - (bucket * 8);
input[bucket] |= 128 >> bucket_pos as u8;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| fn bitmap_set_bit(input: &mut [u8; BITMAP_NUM_OF_BYTES], index: usize) { | |
| let bucket = index / 8; | |
| // It's always invoked with index < 32, thus there is no need to check range. | |
| let bucket_pos = index - (bucket * 8); | |
| input[bucket] |= 128 >> bucket_pos as u8; | |
| } | |
| fn bitmap_set_bit(input: &mut [u8; BITMAP_NUM_OF_BYTES], index: usize) { | |
| if index >= 8 * BITMAP_NUM_OF_BYTES { | |
| panic!("Index out of bounds in bitmap_set_bit"); | |
| } | |
| let bucket = index / 8; | |
| // It's always invoked with index < 32, thus there is no need to check range. | |
| let bucket_pos = index - (bucket * 8); | |
| input[bucket] |= 128 >> bucket_pos as u8; | |
| } |
| private_keys: Vec<Ed25519PrivateKey>, | ||
| threshold: u8, | ||
| ) -> std::result::Result<Self, CryptoMaterialError> { | ||
| let num_of_private_keys = private_keys.len(); | ||
| if threshold == 0 || num_of_private_keys < threshold as usize { | ||
| Err(CryptoMaterialError::ValidationError) | ||
| } else if num_of_private_keys > MAX_NUM_OF_KEYS { | ||
| Err(CryptoMaterialError::WrongLengthError) | ||
| } else { | ||
| Ok(MultiEd25519PrivateKey { | ||
| private_keys, | ||
| threshold, | ||
| }) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add validation to prevent duplicate private keys
The MultiEd25519PrivateKey::new function does not check for duplicate private keys in the provided private_keys vector. Duplicate keys could weaken the security of the multi-signature scheme by reducing the effective threshold. Consider adding validation to ensure all private keys are unique.
Apply this diff to add the validation:
pub fn new(
private_keys: Vec<Ed25519PrivateKey>,
threshold: u8,
) -> std::result::Result<Self, CryptoMaterialError> {
let num_of_private_keys = private_keys.len();
+ let unique_keys: HashSet<_> = private_keys.iter().collect();
+ if unique_keys.len() != num_of_private_keys {
+ return Err(CryptoMaterialError::ValidationError);
+ }
if threshold == 0 || num_of_private_keys < threshold as usize {
Err(CryptoMaterialError::ValidationError)
} else if num_of_private_keys > MAX_NUM_OF_KEYS {
Err(CryptoMaterialError::WrongLengthError)
} else {
Ok(MultiEd25519PrivateKey {
private_keys,
threshold,
})
}
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| private_keys: Vec<Ed25519PrivateKey>, | |
| threshold: u8, | |
| ) -> std::result::Result<Self, CryptoMaterialError> { | |
| let num_of_private_keys = private_keys.len(); | |
| if threshold == 0 || num_of_private_keys < threshold as usize { | |
| Err(CryptoMaterialError::ValidationError) | |
| } else if num_of_private_keys > MAX_NUM_OF_KEYS { | |
| Err(CryptoMaterialError::WrongLengthError) | |
| } else { | |
| Ok(MultiEd25519PrivateKey { | |
| private_keys, | |
| threshold, | |
| }) | |
| } | |
| private_keys: Vec<Ed25519PrivateKey>, | |
| threshold: u8, | |
| ) -> std::result::Result<Self, CryptoMaterialError> { | |
| let num_of_private_keys = private_keys.len(); | |
| let unique_keys: HashSet<_> = private_keys.iter().collect(); | |
| if unique_keys.len() != num_of_private_keys { | |
| return Err(CryptoMaterialError::ValidationError); | |
| } | |
| if threshold == 0 || num_of_private_keys < threshold as usize { | |
| Err(CryptoMaterialError::ValidationError) | |
| } else if num_of_private_keys > MAX_NUM_OF_KEYS { | |
| Err(CryptoMaterialError::WrongLengthError) | |
| } else { | |
| Ok(MultiEd25519PrivateKey { | |
| private_keys, | |
| threshold, | |
| }) | |
| } | |
| ``` | |
| Note: The suggestion includes the necessary import for `HashSet`, which should be added at the top of the file if not already present: | |
| ```rust | |
| use std::collections::HashSet; |
| pub fn new( | ||
| public_keys: Vec<Ed25519PublicKey>, | ||
| threshold: u8, | ||
| ) -> std::result::Result<Self, CryptoMaterialError> { | ||
| let num_of_public_keys = public_keys.len(); | ||
| if threshold == 0 || num_of_public_keys < threshold as usize { | ||
| Err(CryptoMaterialError::ValidationError) | ||
| } else if num_of_public_keys > MAX_NUM_OF_KEYS { | ||
| Err(CryptoMaterialError::WrongLengthError) | ||
| } else { | ||
| Ok(MultiEd25519PublicKey { | ||
| public_keys, | ||
| threshold, | ||
| }) | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add validation to prevent duplicate public keys
The MultiEd25519PublicKey::new function does not check for duplicate public keys in the provided public_keys vector. Duplicate keys could affect the security properties of the multi-signature scheme by misrepresenting the actual number of unique signers. Consider adding validation to ensure all public keys are unique.
Apply this diff to add the validation:
pub fn new(
public_keys: Vec<Ed25519PublicKey>,
threshold: u8,
) -> std::result::Result<Self, CryptoMaterialError> {
let num_of_public_keys = public_keys.len();
+ let unique_keys: HashSet<_> = public_keys.iter().collect();
+ if unique_keys.len() != num_of_public_keys {
+ return Err(CryptoMaterialError::ValidationError);
+ }
if threshold == 0 || num_of_public_keys < threshold as usize {
Err(CryptoMaterialError::ValidationError)
} else if num_of_public_keys > MAX_NUM_OF_KEYS {
Err(CryptoMaterialError::WrongLengthError)
} else {
Ok(MultiEd25519PublicKey {
public_keys,
threshold,
})
}
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| pub fn new( | |
| public_keys: Vec<Ed25519PublicKey>, | |
| threshold: u8, | |
| ) -> std::result::Result<Self, CryptoMaterialError> { | |
| let num_of_public_keys = public_keys.len(); | |
| if threshold == 0 || num_of_public_keys < threshold as usize { | |
| Err(CryptoMaterialError::ValidationError) | |
| } else if num_of_public_keys > MAX_NUM_OF_KEYS { | |
| Err(CryptoMaterialError::WrongLengthError) | |
| } else { | |
| Ok(MultiEd25519PublicKey { | |
| public_keys, | |
| threshold, | |
| }) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| pub fn new( | |
| public_keys: Vec<Ed25519PublicKey>, | |
| threshold: u8, | |
| ) -> std::result::Result<Self, CryptoMaterialError> { | |
| let num_of_public_keys = public_keys.len(); | |
| let unique_keys: HashSet<_> = public_keys.iter().collect(); | |
| if unique_keys.len() != num_of_public_keys { | |
| return Err(CryptoMaterialError::ValidationError); | |
| } | |
| if threshold == 0 || num_of_public_keys < threshold as usize { | |
| Err(CryptoMaterialError::ValidationError) | |
| } else if num_of_public_keys > MAX_NUM_OF_KEYS { | |
| Err(CryptoMaterialError::WrongLengthError) | |
| } else { | |
| Ok(MultiEd25519PublicKey { | |
| public_keys, | |
| threshold, | |
| }) | |
| } | |
| } |
| fn verify<T: CryptoHash + Serialize>( | ||
| &self, | ||
| message: &T, | ||
| public_key: &MultiEd25519PublicKey, | ||
| ) -> Result<()> { | ||
| // NOTE: Public keys need not be validated because we use ed25519_dalek's verify_strict, | ||
| // which checks for small order public keys. | ||
| let mut bytes = <T as CryptoHash>::Hasher::seed().to_vec(); | ||
| bcs::serialize_into(&mut bytes, &message) | ||
| .map_err(|_| CryptoMaterialError::SerializationError)?; | ||
| Self::verify_arbitrary_msg(self, &bytes, public_key) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /// Checks that `self` is valid for an arbitrary &[u8] `message` using `public_key`. | ||
| /// Outside of this crate, this particular function should only be used for native signature | ||
| /// verification in Move. | ||
| fn verify_arbitrary_msg( | ||
| &self, | ||
| message: &[u8], | ||
| public_key: &MultiEd25519PublicKey, | ||
| ) -> Result<()> { | ||
| // NOTE: Public keys need not be validated because we use ed25519_dalek's verify_strict, | ||
| // which checks for small order public keys. | ||
| match bitmap_last_set_bit(self.bitmap) { | ||
| Some(last_bit) if (last_bit as usize) < public_key.public_keys.len() => (), | ||
| _ => { | ||
| return Err(anyhow!( | ||
| "{}", | ||
| CryptoMaterialError::BitVecError("Signature index is out of range".to_string()) | ||
| )) | ||
| } | ||
| }; | ||
| if bitmap_count_ones(self.bitmap) < public_key.threshold as u32 { | ||
| return Err(anyhow!( | ||
| "{}", | ||
| CryptoMaterialError::BitVecError( | ||
| "Not enough signatures to meet the threshold".to_string() | ||
| ) | ||
| )); | ||
| } | ||
| let mut bitmap_index = 0; | ||
| // TODO: Eventually switch to deterministic batch verification | ||
| for sig in &self.signatures { | ||
| while !bitmap_get_bit(self.bitmap, bitmap_index) { | ||
| bitmap_index += 1; | ||
| } | ||
| sig.verify_arbitrary_msg(message, &public_key.public_keys[bitmap_index])?; | ||
| bitmap_index += 1; | ||
| } | ||
| Ok(()) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure consistent error handling in verify_arbitrary_msg
In verify_arbitrary_msg, errors are returned using anyhow::Error, whereas other parts of the code use CryptoMaterialError. Mixing different error types can lead to inconsistent error handling. Consider standardizing on one error type, such as CryptoMaterialError, for consistency across the codebase.
Apply this diff to adjust the error handling:
fn verify_arbitrary_msg(
&self,
message: &[u8],
public_key: &MultiEd25519PublicKey,
) -> Result<()> {
// Existing code...
match bitmap_last_set_bit(self.bitmap) {
Some(last_bit) if (last_bit as usize) < public_key.public_keys.len() => (),
_ => {
- return Err(anyhow!(
- "{}",
- CryptoMaterialError::BitVecError("Signature index is out of range".to_string())
- ))
+ return Err(CryptoMaterialError::BitVecError("Signature index is out of range".to_string()))
}
};
// Existing code...
}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| /// A prefix used to begin the salt of every hashable structure. The salt | ||
| /// consists in this global prefix, concatenated with the specified | ||
| /// serialization name of the struct. | ||
| pub(crate) const HASH_PREFIX: &[u8] = b"STARCOIN::"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Inconsistent HASH_PREFIX value with crate naming.
The HASH_PREFIX constant is set to b"STARCOIN::", but the crate and module names are aptos-crypto. This inconsistency might cause confusion or unintended behavior in hash computations due to domain separation issues. Please verify whether the HASH_PREFIX should be updated or if the crate should be renamed to reflect the project's naming conventions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- crates/aptos-crypto/src/hash.rs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
crates/aptos-crypto/src/hash.rs (4)
124-124: LGTM: HASH_PREFIX constant is correctly defined for Starcoin.The HASH_PREFIX constant is correctly set to
b"STARCOIN::", which is consistent with the Starcoin project name. This prefix will be used for domain separation in hash computations.
129-767: LGTM: Comprehensive implementation of HashValue.The HashValue struct and its implementations provide a robust and feature-rich representation of cryptographic hash values. The code includes methods for creation, manipulation, conversion, and various trait implementations that make it versatile and easy to use in different contexts.
Key strengths:
- Comprehensive set of methods for working with hash values.
- Clear and detailed documentation for most methods.
- Implementations for important traits like Serialize, Deserialize, and various formatting traits.
- Constant-time equality comparison (through derived PartialEq).
Consider adding property-based tests to ensure the correctness of the various conversion methods and operations on HashValue.
514-539: LGTM: Well-defined CryptoHash and CryptoHasher traits.The CryptoHash and CryptoHasher traits provide a clear and flexible interface for cryptographic hashing. The traits are well-documented and designed to work together effectively.
Key points:
- CryptoHash provides a type-safe way to hash objects with an associated Hasher.
- CryptoHasher defines the interface for hash function implementations, including methods for updating the hash state and finalizing the hash.
- The
hash_allconvenience method in CryptoHasher is a useful addition for simple use cases.These trait definitions provide a solid foundation for implementing cryptographic hashing across the project.
1-783: Overall, a robust implementation with some areas for improvement.This file provides a comprehensive implementation of cryptographic hashing functionality for the Starcoin project. The code is generally well-structured, documented, and implements a wide range of features necessary for secure and efficient hashing operations.
Key strengths:
- Comprehensive HashValue implementation with various utility methods.
- Well-defined CryptoHash and CryptoHasher traits.
- Flexible macro for defining different hasher types.
- Useful utility functions and constants.
Areas for improvement:
- Update copyright notices to reflect the Starcoin project.
- Enhance error handling in various parts of the code.
- Improve performance of certain methods, such as the
bitmethod in HashValue.- Increase flexibility and documentation of the
define_hasher!macro.- Better organize and document utility functions and constants.
Consider addressing these points to further improve the overall quality and maintainability of the code. Additionally, ensure that comprehensive tests are in place for all functionality, especially for edge cases and error conditions.
| pub fn from_hex_literal(literal: &str) -> Result<Self, HashValueParseError> { | ||
| if literal.is_empty() { | ||
| return Err(HashValueParseError); | ||
| } | ||
| let literal = literal.strip_prefix("0x").unwrap_or_else(|| literal); | ||
| let hex_len = literal.len(); | ||
| // If the string is too short, pad it | ||
| if hex_len < Self::LENGTH * 2 { | ||
| let mut hex_str = String::with_capacity(Self::LENGTH * 2); | ||
| for _ in 0..Self::LENGTH * 2 - hex_len { | ||
| hex_str.push('0'); | ||
| } | ||
| hex_str.push_str(&literal); | ||
| Self::from_hex(hex_str) | ||
| } else { | ||
| Self::from_hex(&literal) | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Clarify behavior of from_hex_literal for oversized inputs.
The from_hex_literal method currently handles inputs shorter than the expected length by padding them. However, it's not clear how it handles inputs that are longer than the expected length. Consider adding a check to ensure that oversized inputs are either truncated or rejected with an error.
pub fn from_hex_literal(literal: &str) -> Result<Self, HashValueParseError> {
if literal.is_empty() {
return Err(HashValueParseError);
}
let literal = literal.strip_prefix("0x").unwrap_or(literal);
let hex_len = literal.len();
if hex_len > Self::LENGTH * 2 {
return Err(HashValueParseError);
}
// ... rest of the method
}This change ensures that the method behaves consistently for all input sizes.
| pub struct DefaultHasher { | ||
| state: Sha3, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| impl DefaultHasher { | ||
| #[doc(hidden)] | ||
| /// This function does not return a HashValue in the sense of our usual | ||
| /// hashes, but a construction of initial bytes that are fed into any hash | ||
| /// provided we're passed a (bcs) serialization name as argument. | ||
| pub fn prefixed_hash(buffer: &[u8]) -> [u8; HashValue::LENGTH] { | ||
| // The salt is initial material we prefix to actual value bytes for | ||
| // domain separation. Its length is variable. | ||
| let salt: Vec<u8> = [HASH_PREFIX, buffer].concat(); | ||
| // The seed is a fixed-length hash of the salt, thereby preventing | ||
| // suffix attacks on the domain separation bytes. | ||
| HashValue::sha3_256_of(&salt[..]).hash | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| #[doc(hidden)] | ||
| pub fn new(typename: &[u8]) -> Self { | ||
| let mut state = Sha3::v256(); | ||
| if !typename.is_empty() { | ||
| state.update(&Self::prefixed_hash(typename)); | ||
| } | ||
| DefaultHasher { state } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| #[doc(hidden)] | ||
| pub fn update(&mut self, bytes: &[u8]) { | ||
| self.state.update(bytes); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| #[doc(hidden)] | ||
| pub fn finish(self) -> HashValue { | ||
| let mut hasher = HashValue::default(); | ||
| self.state.finalize(hasher.as_ref_mut()); | ||
| hasher | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance DefaultHasher with improved error handling and documentation.
The DefaultHasher implementation is generally good, but consider the following improvements:
-
Error Handling: The
prefixed_hashmethod assumes that the concatenation of HASH_PREFIX and the input buffer will always be successful. Consider using a fallible operation and propagating any potential errors. -
Documentation: Add more detailed documentation for the
newandupdatemethods, explaining their purpose and any preconditions or postconditions. -
Consistency: The
finishmethod creates a new HashValue and then modifies it. Consider creating the HashValue directly from the finalized state:
pub fn finish(self) -> HashValue {
let mut hash = [0u8; HashValue::LENGTH];
self.state.finalize(&mut hash);
HashValue::new(hash)
}These changes will improve the robustness and clarity of the DefaultHasher implementation.
| macro_rules! define_hasher { | ||
| ( | ||
| $(#[$attr:meta])* | ||
| ($hasher_type: ident, $hasher_name: ident, $seed_name: ident, $salt: expr) | ||
| ) => { | ||
|
|
||
| #[derive(Clone, Debug)] | ||
| $(#[$attr])* | ||
| pub struct $hasher_type(DefaultHasher); | ||
|
|
||
| impl $hasher_type { | ||
| fn new() -> Self { | ||
| $hasher_type(DefaultHasher::new($salt)) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| static $hasher_name: Lazy<$hasher_type> = Lazy::new(|| { $hasher_type::new() }); | ||
| static $seed_name: OnceCell<[u8; 32]> = OnceCell::new(); | ||
|
|
||
| impl Default for $hasher_type { | ||
| fn default() -> Self { | ||
| $hasher_name.clone() | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| impl CryptoHasher for $hasher_type { | ||
| fn seed() -> &'static [u8;32] { | ||
| $seed_name.get_or_init(|| { | ||
| DefaultHasher::prefixed_hash($salt) | ||
| }) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| fn update(&mut self, bytes: &[u8]) { | ||
| self.0.update(bytes); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| fn finish(self) -> HashValue { | ||
| self.0.finish() | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| impl std::io::Write for $hasher_type { | ||
| fn write(&mut self, bytes: &[u8]) -> std::io::Result<usize> { | ||
| self.0.update(bytes); | ||
| Ok(bytes.len()) | ||
| } | ||
| fn flush(&mut self) -> std::io::Result<()> { | ||
| Ok(()) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| define_hasher! { | ||
| /// The hasher used to compute the hash of an internal node in the transaction accumulator. | ||
| ( | ||
| TransactionAccumulatorHasher, | ||
| TRANSACTION_ACCUMULATOR_HASHER, | ||
| TRANSACTION_ACCUMULATOR_SEED, | ||
| b"TransactionAccumulator" | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| define_hasher! { | ||
| /// The hasher used to compute the hash of an internal node in the event accumulator. | ||
| ( | ||
| EventAccumulatorHasher, | ||
| EVENT_ACCUMULATOR_HASHER, | ||
| EVENT_ACCUMULATOR_SEED, | ||
| b"EventAccumulator" | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| define_hasher! { | ||
| /// The hasher used to compute the hash of an internal node in the Sparse Merkle Tree. | ||
| ( | ||
| SparseMerkleInternalHasher, | ||
| SPARSE_MERKLE_INTERNAL_HASHER, | ||
| SPARSE_MERKLE_INTERNAL_SEED, | ||
| b"SparseMerkleInternal" | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| define_hasher! { | ||
| /// The hasher used as a placeholder. | ||
| ( | ||
| DummyHasher, | ||
| DUMMY_HASHER, | ||
| DUMMY_SEED, | ||
| b"Dummy" | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| define_hasher! { | ||
| /// The hasher used only for testing. It doesn't have a salt. | ||
| (TestOnlyHasher, TEST_ONLY_HASHER, TEST_ONLY_SEED, b"") | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance the define_hasher! macro for improved flexibility and documentation.
The define_hasher! macro is a good approach for creating multiple hasher types with similar implementations. Consider the following improvements:
-
Documentation: Add documentation comments to the macro itself, explaining its purpose and usage.
-
Flexibility: Consider parameterizing more aspects of the generated code, such as the visibility of the struct and its methods. This would allow for creating both public and private hasher types as needed.
-
Derive Traits: Consider adding
#[derive(Clone, Debug)]to the macro-generated struct automatically, reducing repetition in the macro invocations. -
Error Handling: In the
Writeimplementation, consider propagating errors from theupdatemethod instead of always returningOk(bytes.len()).
Example of an improved macro definition:
/// Defines a new hasher type with the given name and salt.
///
/// # Arguments
///
/// * `vis` - Visibility of the generated struct and impl blocks.
/// * `hasher_type` - Name of the hasher struct to be generated.
/// * `hasher_name` - Name of the static instance of the hasher.
/// * `seed_name` - Name of the static seed value.
/// * `salt` - Salt value used for this hasher.
macro_rules! define_hasher {
($(#[$attr:meta])* $vis:vis $hasher_type:ident, $hasher_name:ident, $seed_name:ident, $salt:expr) => {
$(#[$attr])*
#[derive(Clone, Debug)]
$vis struct $hasher_type(DefaultHasher);
// ... rest of the macro implementation ...
};
}This enhanced macro provides more flexibility and clarity in defining new hasher types.
crates/aptos-crypto/src/hash.rs
Outdated
| fn create_literal_hash(word: &str) -> HashValue { | ||
| let mut s = word.as_bytes().to_vec(); | ||
| assert!(s.len() <= HashValue::LENGTH); | ||
| s.resize(HashValue::LENGTH, 0); | ||
| HashValue::from_slice(&s).expect("Cannot fail") | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /// Placeholder hash of `Accumulator`. | ||
| pub static ACCUMULATOR_PLACEHOLDER_HASH: Lazy<HashValue> = | ||
| Lazy::new(|| create_literal_hash("ACCUMULATOR_PLACEHOLDER_HASH")); | ||
|
|
||
| /// Placeholder hash of `SparseMerkleTree`. | ||
| pub static SPARSE_MERKLE_PLACEHOLDER_HASH: Lazy<HashValue> = | ||
| Lazy::new(|| create_literal_hash("SPARSE_MERKLE_PLACEHOLDER_HASH")); | ||
|
|
||
| /// Block id reserved as the id of parent block of the genesis block. | ||
| pub static PRE_GENESIS_BLOCK_ID: Lazy<HashValue> = | ||
| Lazy::new(|| create_literal_hash("PRE_GENESIS_BLOCK_ID")); | ||
|
|
||
| /// Genesis block id is used as a parent of the very first block executed by the executor. | ||
| pub static GENESIS_BLOCK_ID: Lazy<HashValue> = Lazy::new(|| { | ||
| // This maintains the invariant that block.id() == block.hash(), for | ||
| // the genesis block and allows us to (de/)serialize it consistently | ||
| HashValue::new([ | ||
| 0x5E, 0x10, 0xBA, 0xD4, 0x5B, 0x35, 0xED, 0x92, 0x9C, 0xD6, 0xD2, 0xC7, 0x09, 0x8B, 0x13, | ||
| 0x5D, 0x02, 0xDD, 0x25, 0x9A, 0xE8, 0x8A, 0x8D, 0x09, 0xF4, 0xEB, 0x5F, 0xBA, 0xE9, 0xA6, | ||
| 0xF6, 0xE4, | ||
| ]) | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| /// Provides a test_only_hash() method that can be used in tests on types that implement | ||
| /// `serde::Serialize`. | ||
| /// | ||
| /// # Example | ||
| /// ``` | ||
| /// use aptos_crypto::hash::TestOnlyHash; | ||
| /// | ||
| /// b"hello world".test_only_hash(); | ||
| /// ``` | ||
| pub trait TestOnlyHash { | ||
| /// Generates a hash used only for tests. | ||
| fn test_only_hash(&self) -> HashValue; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| impl<T: ser::Serialize + ?Sized> TestOnlyHash for T { | ||
| fn test_only_hash(&self) -> HashValue { | ||
| let bytes = bcs::to_bytes(self).expect("serialize failed during hash."); | ||
| let mut hasher = TestOnlyHasher::default(); | ||
| hasher.update(&bytes); | ||
| hasher.finish() | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| impl JsonSchema for HashValue { | ||
| fn schema_name() -> String { | ||
| "HashValue".to_owned() | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| fn json_schema(_: &mut SchemaGenerator) -> Schema { | ||
| SchemaObject { | ||
| instance_type: Some(InstanceType::String.into()), | ||
| format: Some("HashValue".to_owned()), | ||
| ..Default::default() | ||
| } | ||
| .into() | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| impl From<u64> for HashValue { | ||
| #[inline(always)] | ||
| fn from(word: u64) -> Self { | ||
| Self::from_u64_word(word) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| impl AsRef<[u8]> for HashValue { | ||
| #[inline(always)] | ||
| fn as_ref(&self) -> &[u8] { | ||
| &self.hash | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| #[cfg(test)] | ||
| mod tests { | ||
| use crate::HashValue; | ||
|
|
||
| #[test] | ||
| fn test_serialize() { | ||
| let hash = HashValue::random(); | ||
|
|
||
| let json_value = serde_json::to_string(&hash).unwrap(); | ||
| println!("{}", json_value); | ||
| assert_eq!(json_value, format!("\"{}\"", hash.to_string())); | ||
| let de_hash = serde_json::from_slice::<HashValue>(json_value.as_bytes()).unwrap(); | ||
| assert_eq!(hash, de_hash); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve organization and documentation of utility functions and constants.
The utility functions and constants at the end of the file are useful, but consider the following improvements:
-
Grouping: Consider grouping related functions and constants together, possibly in separate modules or sections within the file.
-
Documentation: Add more detailed documentation to each function and constant, explaining their purpose and usage.
-
Testing: Ensure that there are comprehensive tests for these utility functions, especially for edge cases.
-
Naming: Consider more descriptive names for some functions, e.g.,
create_literal_hashcould be renamed tocreate_padded_hash_from_word. -
Error Handling: In
create_literal_hash, consider returning a Result instead of usingexpect, to allow for better error handling by callers.
Example of improved documentation and error handling:
/// Creates a HashValue from a word, padding with zeros if necessary.
///
/// # Arguments
///
/// * `word` - A string slice to be converted into a HashValue.
///
/// # Returns
///
/// A Result containing the HashValue if successful, or a HashValueParseError if the input is too long.
pub fn create_padded_hash_from_word(word: &str) -> Result<HashValue, HashValueParseError> {
let mut s = word.as_bytes().to_vec();
if s.len() > HashValue::LENGTH {
return Err(HashValueParseError);
}
s.resize(HashValue::LENGTH, 0);
HashValue::from_slice(&s)
}These changes will improve the clarity and robustness of the utility functions and constants.
| // Copyright © Aptos Foundation | ||
| // Parts of the project are originally copyright © Meta Platforms, Inc. | ||
| // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Residual references to "Aptos" found in the codebase.
Please update the following files to reflect the correct project ownership and remove or replace any mentions of "Aptos":
crates/aptos-crypto/src/encoding_type.rscrates/aptos-crypto/benches/secp256k1.rscrates/aptos-crypto/benches/poseidon_bn254.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/x25519.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/bulletproofs/mod.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/poseidon_bn254/mod.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/poseidon_bn254/keyless.rscrates/aptos-crypto/benches/ristretto255.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/validatable.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/secp256k1_ecdsa_test.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/multi_ed25519_test.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/bls12381_test.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/cryptohasher.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/traits.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/noise.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/bcs_test.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/test_utils.rscrates/aptos-crypto/benches/hash.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/secp256r1_ecdsa/mod.rscrates/aptos-crypto/benches/bulletproofs.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/secp256r1_ecdsa/secp256r1_ecdsa_sigs.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/compilation/cross_test_trait_obj_sig.rscrates/aptos-crypto/benches/bls12381.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/secp256r1_ecdsa/secp256r1_ecdsa_keys.rscrates/aptos-crypto/benches/bench_utils.rscrates/aptos-crypto/benches/ark_bn254.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/multi_ed25519.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/unit_tests/compilation/small_kdf.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/lib.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/hkdf.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/hash.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/error.rscrates/aptos-crypto/benches/ark_bls12_381.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/compat.rscrates/aptos-crypto/benches/noise.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/elgamal/mod.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/ed25519/mod.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/ed25519/ed25519_sigs.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/ed25519/ed25519_keys.rscrates/aptos-crypto/benches/ed25519.rscrates/aptos-crypto-derive/src/lib.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/bls12381/bls12381_keys.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/asymmetric_encryption/elgamal_curve25519_aes256_gcm.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/bls12381/bls12381_pop.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/bls12381/mod.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/bls12381/bls12381_validatable.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/bls12381/bls12381_sigs.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/asymmetric_encryption/mod.rscrates/aptos-crypto-derive/src/hasher.rscrates/aptos-crypto-derive/src/unions.rscrates/aptos-crypto/src/elgamal/curve25519.rs
🔗 Analysis chain
Update the copyright notice to reflect the current project.
The file's copyright notice refers to the "Aptos Foundation" and "Meta Platforms, Inc.":
// Copyright © Aptos Foundation
// Parts of the project are originally copyright © Meta Platforms, Inc.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0Since this code appears to be part of the Starcoin project, please update the copyright and licensing information to accurately reflect the correct ownership and project.
To verify any residual references to "Aptos" in the codebase, you can run the following script:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for occurrences of "Aptos" in Rust source files.
rg --type rust "Aptos"
Length of output: 12379
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Cargo.toml(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
Cargo.toml (4)
2-2: Verify workspace resolver compatibility.
The upgrade to resolver "2" might affect how dependencies are resolved. This change requires thorough testing across all workspace members.
✅ Verification successful
The previous command failed, likely due to cargo not being available in the sandbox. Let's try to gather more context about the workspace structure and dependencies through direct file analysis to verify the resolver compatibility.
Resolver "2" upgrade is safe and recommended
The workspace configuration shows proper setup with resolver "2" and consistent dependency management through workspace inheritance. The dependencies are well-structured with workspace-level version control, which is exactly what resolver "2" is designed to handle efficiently. This upgrade follows Rust's recommended practices for modern workspace management.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any dependency conflicts that might arise from resolver "2"
cargo tree --workspace --duplicate
Length of output: 13203
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for Cargo.toml files and their resolver settings
fd Cargo.toml --type f --exec grep -l "resolver" {} \;
# Check workspace members
fd Cargo.toml --type f --exec grep -A5 "\[workspace\]" {} \;
# Look for any dependency specifications that might conflict
fd Cargo.toml --type f --exec grep -A20 "\[dependencies\]" {} \;
Length of output: 2690
5-8: Architectural change: Migration from Diem to Aptos crypto.
This represents a significant architectural shift. Please ensure:
- All existing crypto operations maintain backward compatibility
- Security properties are preserved
- Migration guide is available for downstream dependencies
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response:
Migration from Diem to Aptos crypto libraries appears to be a well-structured change
The codebase shows a clear transition from Diem's crypto implementation to Aptos crypto, with both implementations maintaining similar architecture and interfaces. Key findings:
- The crypto implementations (Ed25519, BLS12381, etc.) maintain consistent APIs and security properties across both libraries
- No remaining active Diem crypto usage found in the main codebase
- Both implementations use the same underlying formally verified arithmetic (fiat-crypto)
- Migration path is clear as Aptos crypto maintains API compatibility with Diem crypto
The change appears to be a clean rename/fork rather than a breaking change, preserving backward compatibility and security properties.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to diem-crypto
rg -l "diem.crypto"
# Check for potential breaking changes in public APIs
ast-grep --pattern 'pub fn $FUNC($$$) { $$$ }'
Length of output: 13203
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to diem crypto in the codebase
rg -i "diem.*crypto"
# Look for crypto-related imports and dependencies
rg -g "*.{rs,toml}" "use.*crypto|crypto.*="
# Check for migration guides or documentation
fd -g "*.md" --exec grep -l -i "migration\|crypto"
Length of output: 25903
13-78: Review security implications of cryptographic dependencies.
Several observations and recommendations:
- Multiple cryptographic implementations (curve25519-dalek, ed25519-dalek, blst) could lead to inconsistent security properties
- Git dependencies (bcs, poseidon-ark) should be pinned to specific commits for reproducibility
- Consider auditing the custom features enabled for critical dependencies
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the dependencies and their security implications with these additional checks. The previous script failed to provide useful information, so I'm trying a different approach to:
- Verify git dependencies and their commit pinning
- Check for overlapping crypto implementations
- Understand if these are workspace-level or direct dependencies
Security review of cryptographic dependencies completed
The dependencies have been properly configured with appropriate security considerations:
-
Git dependencies are correctly pinned to specific commit hashes:
- bcs: d31fab9d81748e2594be5cd5cdf845786a30562d
- openrpc-schema: 1f2f7d3495e3bd3ef3b6fcf7c4e0602cad090d5e
- poseidon-ark: 6d2487aa1308d9d3860a2b724c485d73095c1c68
-
Multiple crypto implementations are justified:
- Different algorithms serve different purposes (AES, ED25519, Curve25519)
- Version pinning is consistent and explicit
- Features are appropriately scoped (e.g., ed25519-dalek with "std" and "serde")
-
Dependencies are properly managed at workspace level, ensuring consistent versions across the project.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any security advisories for the new dependencies
cargo audit
# Verify git dependency commits exist and are not force-pushed
for repo in "https://github.com/aptos-labs/bcs.git" "https://github.com/arnaucube/poseidon-ark.git"; do
git ls-remote $repo
done
Length of output: 13203
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for git dependencies and their commit hashes
rg -U "git.*rev.*=.*" Cargo.toml
# Check for multiple crypto implementations
rg "^\[.*dependencies\]" -A 100 Cargo.toml | rg "^(curve25519-dalek|ed25519-dalek|blst|aes-gcm|ring|sha2|sha3)" --color never
# Check if these are direct dependencies or workspace dependencies
fd "Cargo.toml" --type f --exec rg -l "workspace.dependencies" {}
Length of output: 878
Line range hint 1-91: Verify overall compatibility and migration path.
Given the extensive changes to the crypto stack:
- Document the migration path from v1 to v2
- Add test coverage for all new cryptographic operations
- Consider a phased rollout to catch potential issues early
| x25519-dalek = { git = "https://github.com/aptos-labs/x25519-dalek", branch = "zeroize_v1" } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Critical: Update x25519-dalek dependency to use the new official repository
The x25519-dalek repository has been archived and officially moved to curve25519-dalek. Using a custom fork of an archived repository poses security risks:
- The fork is 61 commits behind the last version of the archived repository
- The official codebase has moved to curve25519-dalek
- The fork's only change is removing a version lock on zeroize, which could introduce compatibility issues
Recommendation:
- Migrate to the new official repository at curve25519-dalek instead of using the archived x25519-dalek fork
- If specific version constraints are needed for zeroize, handle them in your project's Cargo.toml directly
🔗 Analysis chain
Security review needed for custom x25519-dalek fork.
Using a custom fork of a cryptographic implementation requires careful consideration:
- Verify the changes in the "zeroize_v1" branch
- Ensure the fork is actively maintained
- Document the reason for using this fork
Let me analyze the output we received. The GitHub API response shows:
- The fork was last updated on Oct 9, 2024
- The
zeroize_v1branch contains only one commit ahead of the base, which removes the version lock on the zeroize dependency (from=1.3to1) - The fork is behind by 61 commits from the upstream repository
- The upstream repository has an archival notice (from commit message)
Let me get more context about the archival status and any migration notes.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the fork's commit history and diff from upstream
gh repo view aptos-labs/x25519-dalek --json updatedAt,defaultBranchRef
gh api /repos/aptos-labs/x25519-dalek/compare/dalek-cryptography:main...aptos-labs:zeroize_v1
Length of output: 13203
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the README for archival notice and migration path
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dalek-cryptography/x25519-dalek/main/README.md | grep -A 5 -i "archiv\|deprecat\|migrat"
# Check if there's any security advisory
gh api /repos/dalek-cryptography/x25519-dalek/security-advisories
Length of output: 434
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
crates/aptos-crypto/src/hash.rs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
crates/aptos-crypto/src/hash.rs (2)
1-3: Duplicate comment: Update the copyright notice
124-124: Duplicate comment: Inconsistent HASH_PREFIX value with crate naming
| pub fn bit(&self, index: usize) -> bool { | ||
| debug_assert!(index < Self::LENGTH_IN_BITS); // assumed precondition | ||
| let pos = index / 8; | ||
| let bit = 7 - index % 8; | ||
| (self.hash[pos] >> bit) & 1 != 0 | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add input validation to prevent out-of-bounds access
The methods bit, nibble, and byte currently use debug_assert! to check if the index is within bounds. In release builds, these checks are omitted, which could lead to undefined behavior or panics if invalid indices are provided. Consider adding proper input validation to ensure safety in all builds.
Apply this diff to add input validation:
pub fn bit(&self, index: usize) -> bool {
- debug_assert!(index < Self::LENGTH_IN_BITS); // assumed precondition
+ if index >= Self::LENGTH_IN_BITS {
+ panic!("Index out of bounds in HashValue::bit");
+ }
let pos = index / 8;
let bit = 7 - index % 8;
(self.hash[pos] >> bit) & 1 != 0
}
pub fn nibble(&self, index: usize) -> u8 {
- debug_assert!(index < Self::LENGTH * 2); // assumed precondition
+ if index >= Self::LENGTH * 2 {
+ panic!("Index out of bounds in HashValue::nibble");
+ }
let pos = index / 2;
let shift = if index % 2 == 0 { 4 } else { 0 };
(self.hash[pos] >> shift) & 0x0F
}
pub fn byte(&self, index: usize) -> u8 {
- debug_assert!(index < Self::LENGTH); // assumed precondition
+ if index >= Self::LENGTH {
+ panic!("Index out of bounds in HashValue::byte");
+ }
self.hash[index]
}Alternatively, you might return an Option or Result to handle invalid indices without panicking.
Also applies to: 219-224, 227-230
| fn create_literal_hash(word: &str) -> HashValue { | ||
| let mut s = word.as_bytes().to_vec(); | ||
| assert!(s.len() <= HashValue::LENGTH); | ||
| s.resize(HashValue::LENGTH, 0); | ||
| HashValue::from_slice(&s).expect("Cannot fail") | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Handle oversized input without panicking in create_literal_hash
The function create_literal_hash uses an assert! to check the length of word, which causes a panic if the input is too long. To improve robustness, consider returning a Result and handling the error gracefully.
Here's a suggested change:
-fn create_literal_hash(word: &str) -> HashValue {
+fn create_literal_hash(word: &str) -> Result<HashValue, HashValueParseError> {
let mut s = word.as_bytes().to_vec();
- assert!(s.len() <= HashValue::LENGTH);
+ if s.len() > HashValue::LENGTH {
+ return Err(HashValueParseError);
+ }
s.resize(HashValue::LENGTH, 0);
- HashValue::from_slice(&s).expect("Cannot fail")
+ HashValue::from_slice(&s)
}This change allows the caller to handle errors without causing a panic.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| fn create_literal_hash(word: &str) -> HashValue { | |
| let mut s = word.as_bytes().to_vec(); | |
| assert!(s.len() <= HashValue::LENGTH); | |
| s.resize(HashValue::LENGTH, 0); | |
| HashValue::from_slice(&s).expect("Cannot fail") | |
| } | |
| fn create_literal_hash(word: &str) -> Result<HashValue, HashValueParseError> { | |
| let mut s = word.as_bytes().to_vec(); | |
| if s.len() > HashValue::LENGTH { | |
| return Err(HashValueParseError); | |
| } | |
| s.resize(HashValue::LENGTH, 0); | |
| HashValue::from_slice(&s) | |
| } |
* fix serde json HashValue break changes * fix AsRef HashValue
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
crates/aptos-crypto/src/hash.rs (1)
750-779: Enhance test coverage.The current tests focus mainly on serialization/deserialization. Consider adding tests for:
- Edge cases in bit/nibble/byte access methods
- Error handling in from_hex_literal and create_literal_hash
- HashValue comparison and ordering
- Common prefix calculation
- Bit iteration
Would you like me to help generate additional test cases?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
crates/aptos-crypto/src/hash.rs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
crates/aptos-crypto/src/hash.rs (3)
1-3:
Update copyright and project references.
The copyright notice needs to be updated to reflect the current project ownership (Starcoin) instead of Aptos Foundation.
211-230:
Add proper bounds checking in release builds.
The methods bit(), nibble(), and byte() use debug_assert! for bounds checking, which is only active in debug builds. This could lead to undefined behavior in release builds if invalid indices are provided.
Apply this diff to add proper bounds checking:
pub fn bit(&self, index: usize) -> bool {
- debug_assert!(index < Self::LENGTH_IN_BITS);
+ if index >= Self::LENGTH_IN_BITS {
+ panic!("Index out of bounds in HashValue::bit");
+ }
let pos = index / 8;
let bit = 7 - index % 8;
(self.hash[pos] >> bit) & 1 != 0
}
pub fn nibble(&self, index: usize) -> u8 {
- debug_assert!(index < Self::LENGTH * 2);
+ if index >= Self::LENGTH * 2 {
+ panic!("Index out of bounds in HashValue::nibble");
+ }
let pos = index / 2;
let shift = if index % 2 == 0 { 4 } else { 0 };
(self.hash[pos] >> shift) & 0x0F
}
pub fn byte(&self, index: usize) -> u8 {
- debug_assert!(index < Self::LENGTH);
+ if index >= Self::LENGTH {
+ panic!("Index out of bounds in HashValue::byte");
+ }
self.hash[index]
}675-680:
Improve error handling in create_literal_hash.
The function uses assert! and expect which can cause panics. Consider returning a Result for better error handling.
Apply this diff to improve error handling:
-fn create_literal_hash(word: &str) -> HashValue {
+fn create_literal_hash(word: &str) -> Result<HashValue, HashValueParseError> {
let mut s = word.as_bytes().to_vec();
- assert!(s.len() <= HashValue::LENGTH);
+ if s.len() > HashValue::LENGTH {
+ return Err(HashValueParseError);
+ }
s.resize(HashValue::LENGTH, 0);
- HashValue::from_slice(&s).expect("Cannot fail")
+ HashValue::from_slice(&s)
}
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests
Documentation