action fee changes #854
action fee changes #854
Conversation
|
|
||
| ## Forward fees | ||
|
|
||
| Internal messages define an `ihr_fee` in Toncoins, which is subtracted from the value attached to the message and awarded to the validators of the destination shardchain if they include the message through the IHR mechanism. The `fwd_fee` is the original total forwarding fee paid for using the HR mechanism; it is automatically computed from the [24 and 25 configuration parameters](/v3/documentation/network/configs/blockchain-configs#param-24-and-25) and the size of the message at the time the message is generated. Note that the total value carried by a newly created internal outbound message equals the sum of the value, `ihr_fee`, and `fwd_fee`. This sum is deducted from the balance of the source account. Of these components, only the value is always credited to the destination account upon message delivery. The `fwd_fee` is collected by the validators on the HR path from the source to the destination, and the `ihr_fee` is either collected by the validators of the destination shardchain (if the message is delivered via IHR) or credited to the destination account. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Однако сейчас ihr не имплементирован, и если выставить его ненулевым, то ihr fee просто добавится к value сообщения при получении
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"Is either collected by the validators of the destination shardchain (if the message is delivered via IHR) or credited to the destination account."
I guess there is no contradiction here, but if you want so, i can add a tip.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes, there are no contradictions, but considering that ihr is not working now, and ihr_fee can still be set, I would add a tip with the clarification that this is the state as of October 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip added.
| ## Action fee | ||
|
|
||
| Action fee is deducted from the balance of the source account during processing action list which is perfomed after Computing phase. | ||
| These are the actions that lead to pay fees: | ||
| The action fee is deducted from the balance of the source account during the processing of the action list, which occurs after the Computing phase. Practically, the only action for which you pay an action fee is `SENDRAWMSG`. Other actions, such as `RAWRESERVE` or `SETCODE`, do not incur any fee during the action phase. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Формально за SENDMSG тоже нужно платить action_fee, но я думаю это не столь обязательно уточнять
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What is SENDMSG action? I see only SENDRAWMSG both in TVM whitepapers - https://docs.ton.org/tvm.pdf,
and in official implementation transaction.cpp - https://github.com/ton-blockchain/ton/blob/master/crypto/block/transaction.cpp
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I guess the misconception here is the existence of two TVM instructions - SENDMSG and SENDRAWMSG, that create output actions. Nevertheless, in relation to the c5 register and action phase, we are talking about actions
themselves, one of which is the namesake SENDRAWMSG. Those are different entities. But if you think this will be a widespread misconception, we can add a WARN section describing that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, my bad, indeed, I mixed up action and tvm instruction. I think there is no need to add anything here
| * `CHANGELIB` creates an output action similarly to `SETLIBCODE`, but instead of the library code accepts its hash. | ||
| * `FB08–FB3F` reserved for output action primitives. | ||
| ```cpp | ||
| action_fee = ceil((msg_fwd_fees * first_frac)/ 2^16); //internal |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You are right, my bad, fixed.
* action fee changes * floor fix * Adding not-implemented IHR tip & join 2 warning sections
No description provided.