Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Add Funding and Sustainability notes
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
manics committed Oct 16, 2024
1 parent fbdf374 commit 0fc7d2e
Showing 1 changed file with 26 additions and 0 deletions.
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1 +1,27 @@
# Working Group: Funding & Sustainability

## Notes

- Various strands to TREs: data partner - technology / infrastructure side - data curation itself, information governance
- Sustaining the future of the 'TRE' workforce itself - career progressions/frameworks/training
- Very specialised work
- Any staff churn is very damaging to hive knowledge/capability
- Hard to recruit and retain
- Cohesion at UKRI (really across councils) level is really needed
- Using RSE Con as an example: came about to (1) reduce the brain drain in the RSE space and (2)
- How does funding work today?
- So many models today and horrible to work with.
- What could it look like?
- Define challenge and difficulty
- Health, admin, etc. all fund/operate in different ways
- 80% FEC is difficult for non-academic roles
- What is the role of TREs in teaching new methods/techiques?
- How do we bring information governance knowledge up to date with software/infra/data techniques in order to provide appropriate audit? (training challenge)
- Roadmap between current state and goal.
- Who is funding different challenges?
- How are these coordinated?
- Articulate risks and issues
- What is the direction of the community?
- Should it be it's own society?
- Should it be part of RSE soc?
- How do we represent very different skills without needing to join _yet another org_

0 comments on commit 0fc7d2e

Please sign in to comment.