TEST: Backport adjustments to linear regression tolerances #2245
+2
−2
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…uxlfoundation#2199) * adjust tolerance for platforms where test fails * widen
david-cortes-intel
added
the
testing
david-cortes-intel
requested review from
Alexsandruss,
samir-nasibli and
icfaust
as code owners
|
CI failures should be fixed by backporting this other PR: |
|
This one perhaps could also be merged without squashing. |
Alexsandruss
approved these changes
Jan 9, 2025
Alexsandruss
merged commit 08d41b2
into
uxlfoundation:rls/2025.1.0-rls
18 of 19 checks passed
|
That's curious. This other PR got merged without squashing: |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR backports to the 2025.1 release branch some changes to test tolerances that were giving issues in some platforms.
PR should start as a draft, then move to ready for review state after CI is passed and all applicable checkboxes are closed.
This approach ensures that reviewers don't spend extra time asking for regular requirements.
You can remove a checkbox as not applicable only if it doesn't relate to this PR in any way.
For example, PR with docs update doesn't require checkboxes for performance while PR with any change in actual code should have checkboxes and justify how this code change is expected to affect performance (or justification should be self-evident).
Checklist to comply with before moving PR from draft:
PR completeness and readability
Testing
Performance
Not applicable.