Remove normative keywords and conformance section from the exemption note #2671
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mattgarrish
requested review from
iherman,
gregoriopellegrino,
shiestyle,
wareid and
avneeshsingh
iherman
approved these changes
Dec 13, 2024
shiestyle
approved these changes
Dec 13, 2024
|
Overtaken by events per w3c/strategy#481 (comment) and subsequent change in the proposed charter. Closing without merge. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Concerns have been raised in the charter process about the use of normative language in the exemption note. There are only three instances where we've used normative keywords, primarily in defining the value of the property. None of these is essential and this pull request rewords them out of the document.
I've also added a note to the overview that the we don't plan to take this property any further down the standardization track; that's it's defined as a convenience for those who need it.
Let me know if there are any concerns with this before we take it any further.
See Preview, Diff